CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Sections › BSA › Section 36

BSA Section 36: Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35

Section 36 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023 deals with relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35. It replaces Evidence Act 42 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

Text of BSA Section 36

36. Judgments, orders or decrees other than those mentioned in section 35 are relevant if they relate to matters of a public nature relevant to the enquiry; but such judgments, orders or decrees are not conclusive proof of that which they state.

Illustration.

A sues B for trespass on his land. B alleges the existence ofa public right of way over the land, which A denies. The existence of a decree in favour of the defendant, in a suit by A against C for a trespass on the same land, in which C alleged the existence of the same right of way, is relevant, but it is not conclusive proof that the right of way exists.

Relevancy of statements as to any law contained in law books including electronic or digital form.

What evidence to be given when statement forms part of a conversation, document, electronic record, book or series of letters or papers.

Previous judgments relevant to bar a second suit or trial.

Relevancy of certain judgments in probate, etc., jurisdiction.

Relevancy and effect of judgments, orders or decrees, other than those mentioned in section 35.

Judgments, etc., other than those mentioned in sections 34, 35 and 36 when relevant.

Fraud or collusion in obtaining judgment, or incompetency of Court, may be proved.

Opinions of experts.

Evidence Act sections replaced

Ask CaseMinister about BSA 36

Get the judgments that apply this section, with the paragraph relied on in each and what later Benches said about it. Two answers free on WhatsApp, no signup.

← BSA 35BSA 38 →