CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Vinod Biharilal Narang v. State of Maharashtra .

Vinod Biharilal Narang v. State of Maharashtra .

Supreme Court of India · 31 March 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
31 March 2008
Case no.
C.A. No. 2399 of 2008
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 2399 OF 2008

[Arising out of SLP(C) No.19000/2006]

VINOD BIHARILAL NARANG
...
APPELLANT(S)

:VERSUS:

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.
...
RESPONDENT(S)

ORDER

Leave granted.

Having heard the learned counsel for the parties we are of the opinion that the writ appeal filed by the respondents before the High Court should not have been entertained, the writ petition having been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution.

The impugned judgment being wholly without jurisdiction is a nullity and it is set aside accordingly. The matter is remitted to the learned Single Judge of the High Court for consideration thereof afresh. All contentions of the parties shall, however, remain open before the Single Judge. The learned Single Judge is requested to consider the desirability of expediting the hearing of the writ petition.

The appeal is disposed of with the aforementioned direction.

..........................J
(S.B. SINHA)

..........................J (LOKESHWAR SINGH PANTA) NEW DELHI, MARCH 31, 2008.

Ask CaseMinister about Vinod Biharilal Narang v. State of Maharashtra .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp