CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › Union of India v. Dharam Pal .

Union of India v. Dharam Pal .

Supreme Court of India · 29 March 1996 · [1996] 3 S.C.R. 1056

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
29 March 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 7062 of 1996
Reported as
[1996] 3 S.C.R. 1056
Result
Disposed of
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
4 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
DHARMA PAL & ORS. ETC.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 29/03/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
1996 SCC (4) 195 JT 1996 (4) 371
1996 SCALE (3)672

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7065, 7063-64 OF 1996

(Arising out of SLP (C) No. 2967/94, 27737 & 27844/95)

ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

Pursuant to the direction given by this Court the appellants have framed the scheme. Shri K.B. Sharma, Superintending Engineer, Construction Circle No.2, Chandigarh Administration has placed the same along with the additional affidavit. The scheme has been approved by the Central Government. The scheme reads as under:

For work charged employees:

"i) All the works establishment

[excluding office of Ministerial

Clerical and drawing cadres below

the level of Junior Engineers

engaged in the

construction/execution of

maintenance work shall be called

’Work Force’. The work force

includes buildings, roads, public

health activities comprising

augmentation of water supply canals

drainage, electrical and

electricity etc. The ’work

division’ shall be a unit for

casual or daily wage work force and

a ’circle’ for work charged

establishment. Separate cadre and

seniority list for each category

shall be maintained in the Division

and Circle as the case may be.

ii) Workers engaged on jobs, which

are likely to be of a short

duration, i.e., less than 240 days

in a year will be terminated on

completion of work. No seniority

list of such workers will be

required to be maintained.

iii) Workers who have completed

five years service as on 31st

August, 1995 will be considered for

regularization against the

available regular posts subject to

the fulfillment of requirement as

laid down in the Recruitment Rules

for the post in question, if they

were recruited before 6.1.1992 the

date on which a ban was imposed on

the recruitment or daily/casual

workers.

iv) Since a complete ban on

recruitment of work charged

casual/daily wage employees was

imposed by Chandigarh

Administration, those recruited in

contravention of this policy

decision after this dated i.e.

6.1.1992 will be considered for

their regularization only on the

assessment of

justification/requirements on the

basis of norms approved for the

continued nature or work and

attaching the specific approval of

Home Department, Chandigarh

Administration.

For Casual/Daily Wagers

v) Workers working as Casual

labourers in works which have more

or less fixed period of completion

will be eligible for payment of

benefits as admissible to them

under rules. However, they will not

be considered for regularization

automatically. Their requirement

has to be reassessed after

commissioning the work. Thus, the

workers will be liable to be

retrenched on completion of works

except categories in limited

numbers who are required for the

operation and maintenance of the

completed works. In their cases

specific approval of the Home

Department should be taken.

vi) Daily wage employees who have

completed 10 years or more service

as on 31.8.1995 shall be considered

for regularization w.e.f. 31.8.1995

on the availability of posts. Such

employees shall be entitled for

minimum of the scale w.e.f. the

date of their regularization. On

regularization, these employees

shall be liable for transfer any

where within the Engineering

Department, U.T. Chandigarh.

vii) In respect of all such daily

wages employees, who have not yet

completed 10 years service, a

special review should be carried

out at the level of Head of

Department regarding their

requirement.

viii) In the case of those

employees whose services are no

longer required and have been taken

after 6.1.1992 and specific

approval of Home Department,

Chandigarh Administration does not

exist, they may be relieved of

their duties at the earliest

possible."

Shri Poti, learned senior counsel has brought to our notice letter dated January 4, 1996 addressed by the Joint Secretary, Personnel to all the heads of the Departments in which it was stated that they were examining the payment of the D.A., C.C.A., H.R.A. to all the daily wage workers. By our order dated January 18, 1996, while quoting the above letter that Shri K. Nadhava Reddy, learned senior counsel when was confronted with the same, had expressed his inability to respond to the same. Consequently, we have directed him to obtain instructions in that behalf. Shri Reddy has stated today that pursuant to that letter follow up action was taken by the appellants in their letter dated March 4, 1996 wherein the appellants had examined the impact of the direction issued by the Administrative Tribunal. It is stated that 3647 daily wage/casual employees are now on the muster rolls. If D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A are allowed at full rates it would work out at the approximate rate Rs.8 crores. Therefore, direction seeking their approval has been sought from the Government of India. He stated that the Government of India was not willing to extend the same benefit though formal order has not been communicated so far. The Government of India is willing to permit the appellant to pay 60% of the amount of the minimum pay on par with Punjab pattern Instead of D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A., appellants, therefore, are willing to continue to pay to the daily wage workers above 60% subject to the above scheme. Shri Sharma, learned senior counsel appearing for all the respondents in appeal arising out of SLP No.27844/95 has brought to our notice the provisions of the Equal Remuneration Act, 1976 and Schedules 5 and 3 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

In view of the rival contentions, the only question is whether the appellant would be permitted to proceed in the light of the scheme framed by them or give direction to continue to pay, as directed by the Tribunal. After giving due consideration to the respective contentions, we think that the appropriate course would be to give approval to the scheme framed by the appellants. In view of the settled law by recent decisions all the daily wage employees are required to be regularized in accordance with the rules invogue following the principles of rules of recruitment, reservations and existence of vacancies. Admittedly, there is no rules operating in the field. As a result, all of them have been continuing on daily wage basis. It is true that CAT at Chandigarh had on earlier occasion directed to pay to 88 daily wage employees D.A., H.R.A. and C.C.A. Instead of the repetetion, we think that the scheme requires enforcement.

In view of the scheme now framed, the appellants are directed to regularize all those who have completed the prescribed period of days, viz., 240 days against the existing vacancies applying the rules of reservation in the order of seniority in the respective categories mentioned in the scheme. Such regularized employees would be entitled to all the regular payment at the scale of pay prescribed to the Central Government employees. Those who could not be regularized are directed to be regularized in the order of seniority as and when vacancies arise. Work would be continued to be taken from them as long as the work exists. Even those who were engaged as daily wage/casual labour, who could not complete 240 days but were required to be retrenched, the procedure prescribed for retrenchment under the Industrial Disputes Act should be followed. A list of them in the order of seniority should be maintained. Lastcome first-go principle should be followed in that behalf. As and when vacancies arise or need for the work arises, they should be called for work immediately without asking them to get their names sponsored by the Employment Exchange The daily wage workers/casual workers who are regularized and taken work from them are entitled to minimum of scale of pay prescribed for that post. In addition to that, they are also entitled to 60% of the D.A. at Punjab pattern which is being followed in all other cases. The payment to all the candidates whose service are regularise/continuing on daily wage/casual labour shall be calculated from one year prior to the date or filing the application in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Chandigarh. The appellant are directed to pay the same within a period of four months from to-day.

The appeals are accordingly disposed of. No costs .

Ask CaseMinister about Union of India v. Dharam Pal .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp