CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1990 › Union of India and Anr. v. U.P. State Ware Housing Corporati

Union of India and Anr. v. U.P. State Ware Housing Corporation

Supreme Court of India · 31 October 1990 · [1990] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 523

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
31 October 1990
Reported as
[1990] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 523
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Punchhi, M.M.
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
U.P. STATE WARE HOUSING CORPORATION
DATE OF JUDGMENT31/10/1990
BENCH:
PUNCHHI, M.M.
AGRAWAL, S.C. (J)
CITATION:
1991 AIR 1374 1990 SCR Supl. (2) 523
1991 SCC Supl. (2) 730 JT 1990 (4) 451
1990 SCALE (2)924

ACT

Income Tax Act, 1961 --Section 10(29)--Exemption--Tests--Whether rental income derived from godowns and warehouse of U.P. State Ware Housing Corporation exempted.

HEADNOTE

The Income Tax Officer required the U.P. State Ware Housing Corporation, a creature of the Ware Housing Corporations Act, 1962, to pay a sum of money as advance tax for the Assessment Year 1974-75, taking the view that rental income derived by the assessee-Respondent from its godown and ware-homes was not exempted.

The claim of exemption under section 10(29) of the Income Tax Act of the assessee having been repeatedly rejected by the Appellants, it filed a writ petition in the High Court challenging the notice.

The High Court quashed the notice, allowing the case of the assessee-Respondent.

In the appeal by the certificate the Revenue-Appellants assailed the view of the High Court. Dismissing the appeal, this Court,

HELD: 1. The assessee would be entitled to exemption, if (i) it is an authority constituted under any law; (ii) it is an authority constituted for marketing of commodities; (iii) the exemptable income is in respect of letting of godowns or ware-houses for storage, processing or facilitating the marketing of commodities. [525D-E]

2. Plain reading of Section 10(29) makes it evident that the authority must he constituted under any law for the time being in force, which in other words means that it should be a creature of law. As an artificial person, it should be clothed with a personality ordained by law. [525G] 3. In the instant case, the first test was proved that the assessee 524 was an authority under the Ware Housing Corporations Act, 1962. [525F]

4. The second test requiring the authority to be constituted for marketing of commodities is also fully satisfied by Section 24(d) of the Ware Housing Corporations Act, 1962. The activities of the assessee as an agent were the activities facilitating the marketing of commodities, which have a business element and the second test was also established. [526B-C]

5. The third test with regard to the exemptable income being in respect of letting of godowns or ware-houses for storage, processing or facilitating the marketing of commodities presents no difficulty because it stands undisputed that the income derived by the assessee was from letting 01’ godowns or ware-houses. The assessee having fulfilled all the tests was rightly entitled to the exemption as claimed. [526D-E]

JUDGMENT

Ask CaseMinister about Union of India and Anr. v. U.P. State Ware Housing Corporation

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp