CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1995 › U.P.P.S.C. Allahabad v. Vinod Kumar Srivastava

U.P.P.S.C. Allahabad v. Vinod Kumar Srivastava

Supreme Court of India · 31 July 1995 · [1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 424

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
31 July 1995
Case no.
C.A. No. 7400 of 1995
Reported as
[1995] SUPP. 2 S.C.R. 424
Result
Disposed of
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
U.P. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ALLAHABAD
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
VINOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT31/07/1995
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
PARIPOORNAN, K.S.(J)
CITATION:
1995 SCALE (4)849

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Leave granted.

We have heard the counsel for the parties. The admitted facts as transpired from the record are that the Assistant Labour Commissioners are eligible to be promoted according to Rule 5 of the U.P. Labour Service Rules, 1991 to their quota of 50%. The balance 50% shall be filled in by direct recruitment. Twenty-three posts are available for promotion. The Selection Committee consisting of members of the Public Service Commission and the Departmental personnel considered the inter se claims from feeder posts on September 13, 1993 and forwarded to the Government the select list for approval subject to the result in W.P. No. 5744/86. One Mr. Awasthi who filed that writ petition has since been retired as Dy. Labour Officer pursuant to the direction issued by the Court, the claims of others for promotion require to be considered and finalised. We direct the Government to finalise the list as recommended by the Public Service Commission and then make promotion to the substantive posts according to Rules of all the persons recommended by the Public Service Commission within the quota prescribed under the Rules. The appeal is disposed of. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about U.P.P.S.C. Allahabad v. Vinod Kumar Srivastava

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp