CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1977 › State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Washi Ahmed Etc.

State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Washi Ahmed Etc.

Supreme Court of India · 7 March 1977 · [1977] 3 S.C.R. 149

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
7 March 1977
Reported as
[1977] 3 S.C.R. 149
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Bhagwati, P.N.
Length
4 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
WASHI AHMED ETC.
DATE OF JUDGMENT07/03/1977
BENCH:
BHAGWATI, P.N.
FAZALALI, SYED MURTAZA
CITATION:
1977 AIR 1638 1977 SCR (3) 149
1977 SCC (2) 246

ACT

Taxing statute--Principles of construction of words in a

taxing statute--Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, Sched-

ule I, Item 6--"Green ginger",whether means a "vegetable"

falling within the category of goods described as "vegeta-

bles, green or dried commonly known as subji, tarkari or

sak" and thus exempt from tax liability.

HEADNOTE

Section 6(1) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act 1941

exempts from tax liability "vegetables, green or dried

commonly known as subji, tarkari or sak" when not sold in

sealed containers. The Sales Tax Authorities levied sales

tax on "green ginger" sold by the respondents, taking the

view that inasmuch as green ginger is. used to add flavour

and taste to food. it is not "vegetable commonly known as

subji, tarkari or sak". A writ petition challenging the

validity of the orders of assessment was allowed by the

Calcutta High Court which held that green ginger is vegeta-

ble within the meaning of that expression as used in Item 6

of the First Schedule to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act,

1941.

Dismissing the State appeals by Special Leave the Court,

HELD: (1) Green ginger is included. within the meaning

of the words "vegetables---commonly known as subji, tarkari-

or sak" in Item 6 of Schedule I and its sales are exempt

from tax under s. 6 of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act,

1941. [152 D]

(2) The word "vegetable" though not defined in the Act,

being a word of every day use, must be construed not in any

technical sense, nor from any botanical point of view but as

understood m common parlance i.e. denoting class of vegeta-

bles which are grown in a kitchen garden or in a farm and

are used for the table. The word "vegetable" in Item 6 of

Schedule I to the Act, so construed, by giving its popular

sense meaning, "that sense which people conversant with the

subject-matter with which the statute is dealing would

attribute to it" denotes those classes of vegetables which

are grown in a kitchen garden or in a farm and are used for

the table. Green ginger obviously is a vegetable grown in a

kitchen garden or in a farm and it is used for the table.

It may not be used as a principal item of the meal, but it

certainly forms part of the meal as a subsidiary item.

Green ginger is generally regarded as included within the

meaning of the word "vegetable" as understood in common

parlance. 1[150 F-H, 151 G-H, 152 A]

Ramavatar Badhaiprasad v. Assistant Sales Tax Officer

Akola, A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1325; M/s. Motipur Zamindary Co.

Ltd. v. State of Bihar A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 660, applied.

Madhya Pradesh Pan Merchants’ Association, Santra Mar-

ket, Nagpur v. State of Madhya Pradesh 7 S.T. Cases 99 at

102, referred to.

Grenfell v. I.R.C. (1876) 1 Ex. D. 242 at 248; Planters

Nut and Chocolate Co. Ltd. v. The King (1951) 1 D.L.R. 385;

200 Chests of Tea (1824) 9 Wheaton (U.S.) 430, at 438 quoted

with approval.

JUDGMENT

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION: Civil Appeal Nos. 1546-

1551 of 1971.

(From 1he Judgment and Order dated 20-12-1968 of the

Calcutta High Court in Appeals from Original Orders Nos.

556-559, 571 and 572 of 1967)

150

Lal Narain Sinha, Sol. General and G.S. Chatterice, for

the appellants.

Purushottam Chatterjee and Ratbin Des, for the respondents.

The Judgment of the Court was delivered by

BHAGWATI, J.--The short question which arises for deter-

mination in these appeals is whether green ginger falls

within the category of goods described as "vegetables, green

or dried, commonly known as "sabji, tarkeri or ask" in Item

(6) of Schedule I to the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act,

1941. If it is covered by this description, it would be

exempt from sales tax imposed under the provisions of that

Act. The Sales Tax authorities held that green ginger is

used to. add Havour and. taste to food and it is, therefore,

not vegetable commonly known as sabji, tarkeri or ask". The

orders of the Sales Tax authorities were challenged in a

writ petition filed under article 226 of the Constitution

and a Single Judge of the High Court who. heard the writ

petition disagreed with the view taken by the Sales Tax

authorities and held that green ginger is vegetable within

the meaning of that expression as used in Item (6) of the

First Schedule to the Act. This view of the learned Single’

Judge was affirmed by a Division Bench of the High Court on

appeal under clause (15) of the Letters Patent. Hence the

present appeal by the State with special leave obtained from

this Court.

The Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 levies sales

tax on the taxable turnover of a dealer computed in accord-

ance with the provisions of that Act. Section 6, sub-sec-

tion (1) provides that no tax shall be payable under the Act

on the sale of goods specified in the first column of Sched-

ule I, subject to the conditions and exceptions, if any, set

out in the corresponding entry in the second column thereof

and Item (6) of Schedule I specifies in the first column

"vegetable, green or dried, commonly known as "Sabji, tar-

kari or ask" so that no. tax is payable on the sale of goods

falling within this category, subject to the exception set

out in the second column, namely, that they would be liable

to bear tax "when sold in sealed containers." It was common

ground in the present case that green ginger was not sold by

the assessee in sealed containers and the only question

which, therefore, requires to be considered is whether green

ginger can be regarded as vegetable commonly known as

’sabji, tarkari or sak’. Now, the word ’vegetable’ is not

defined in the Act but it is well settled as a result of

several decisions of this Court of which we may mention only

two, namely, Ram avatar Budhaiprasad v. Assistant Sales Tax

Officer, kola(1) and M/s Motipur Jamindary Co. Ltd. v. State

of Bihar(2)) that this word, being a word of every day use,

must be construed not in any technical sense, nor from any

botanical point of view, but as understood in common par-

lance. The question which arose in Ramavatar’s case

(supra) was whether betel leaves are "vegetables"

(1) A.I.R. 1961 S.C. 1325.

(2) A.I.R. 1962 S.C. 660.

151

and this court held that they are not included within that

term. This Court quoted with approval the following passage

from the judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh in

Madhya Pradesh Pan Merchants’ Association, Santra Market,

Nagput v. State of Madhya Pradesh(1):

"In our opinion, the word "vegetables"

cannot be given the comprehensive meaning the

term bears in natural history and has not been

given that meaning in taxing statutes before.

The term "vegetables" is to be understood as

commonly understood denoting those classes of

vegetable matter which are grown in kitchen

gardens and are used for the table.",

and observed that "the word ’vegetable’ in taxing statutes

is to be understood as in common parlance i.e. denoting

class of vegetables which are grown in a kitchen garden or

in a farm and are used for the table". This meaning of the

word ’vegetable’ was reiterated by this Court in Motipur

zamindary case (supra) where this Court was called upon to

consider whether sugarcane can be regarded as vegetable and

it was held by this Court that sugarcane cannot be said to

fail within the definition of the word ’vegetable’.

It is interesting to note that the same principle of

construction in relation to words used in a taxing statute

has also been adopted in English, Canadian and American

courts. Pollock B. pointed out in Grenfell v. I.R.C.(2)

that "if a statute contains language which is capable of

being construed in a popular sense, such a statute is not to

be construed according to the strict or technical meaning of

the language contained in it, but is to be construed in its

popular sense, meaning, of course, by the words "popular

sense" that sense which people conversant with the subject-

matter with which the statute is dealing would attribute to

it.’" So also the Supreme Court of Canada said in Planters

Nut and Chocolate Co. Ltd. v. The King,(3) while interpret-

ing the words ’fruit’ and ’vegetable’ in the Excise Act:

"They are ordinary words in every day use and are, there-

fore, to be construed according to their popular sense".

The same rule was expressed in slightly different language

by Story, J., in 200 Chests of Tea(4) where the learned

Judge said that "the particular words used by the Legisla-

ture in the denomination of articles are to be understood

according to the common commercial understanding of the

terms used, and not in their scientific or technical sense,

for the Legislature does "not suppose our merchants to be

naturalists, or geologists, or botanists" ".

It will, therefore, be seen that the word ’vegetable’ in

Item (6) of Schedule I to the Act must be construed as

understood in common parlance and it must be given its

popular sense meaning "that sense which people conversant

with the subject-matter with which the statute is dealing

would attribute to it" and so construed, it denotes those

classes of vegetables which are grown in a kitchen garden or

in a farm and are used for the table. Now, obviously green

ginger is a vegetable

(1) 7 S.T.C. 99 at 102.

(2) (1876) 1 Ex. D. 242 at 248.

(3) (1951) 1 D.L.R. 385.

(4) (1824), 9 Wheaton (U.S.) 430 at 438.

11--240SCI/77

152

grown in a kitchen garden or in a farm and is used for the

table. It may not be used as a principal item of the meal

but it certainly forms part of the meal as a subsidiary

item. It is an item which is ordinarily sold by a vegetable

vendor and both the vegetable vendor who every day deals in

vegetables and the housewife who. daily goes to the market

to purchase vegetables would unhesitatingly re and green

ginger as vegetable. The assessee in fact placed evidence

before the Sales Tax authorities showing that the Railway

authorities also treated green ginger as vegetable for the

purpose of railway tariff and charged for the carriage of

green ginger at the reduced rate applicable to vegetables

and even the Corporation of Calcutta included green ginger

in the category of vegetables in the market bulletin pub-

lished by it fortnightly showing the rates in the municipal

market. There can, therefore, be little doubt that green

ginger is generally regarded as included within the meaning

of the word ’vegetable’ as understood in common parlance.

That a part, we find that Item (6) speaks not simply of

vegetables but "vegetables--commonly known as sabji, tar-

kari or sak" and the Division Bench of the High Court held

green ginger to fall within the meaning of the words "sabji,

tarkari or sak". We should certainly be very slow to disturb

a meaning placed on these words in Bengali language by two

judges of the High Court who may reasonably be expected to

be quite conversant with that language. We are accordingly

of the view that green ginger is included within the meaning

of the words "vegetables--commonly known as sabji, tarkari

or sak" in Item (6) of Schedule I and its sales must be held

to be, exempt from tax under section 6 of the Act.

The result is that the appeals fail and are dismissed

with costs. Costs will be only m one set.

S.R. Appeals dismissed.

153

Ask CaseMinister about State of West Bengal & Ors. v. Washi Ahmed Etc.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp