CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › State of Punjab v. Lal Singh

State of Punjab v. Lal Singh

Supreme Court of India · 18 November 1996 · [1996] Supp. (8) S.C.R. 718

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
18 November 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 15057 of 1996
Reported as
[1996] Supp. (8) S.C.R. 718
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
LAL SINGH & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 18/11/1996
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

We have learned counsel on both sides.

This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, made on November 2,1995 in CWP No. 16409/92. The controversy raised in for the advance increment. In which scale of pay the respondents are entitled to advance increment is the question? Admittedly, the respondents were appointed on substantive posts of JBT Teachers and they were temporarily promoted as Head Teachers. The scale of pay for the JBT Teachers is Rs. 1200- 2100/-. They are discharging the duties temporarily as Head Teachers in the initial pay of Rs. 1410/-. They claimed advance increment for discharging the duty as Head Teachers. The High Court has construed that they are entitled to the advance increment as Head Teachers. Rule 4(4) of the Punjab Civil Volume I, part I which reads as under :

"4.4 The initial substantive pay of

a Government employee who is

appointed substantively to a post

on a time-scale of pay is regulated

as follows:

(i) When appointment is the new

post involves the assumption of

duties or responsibilities of

greater importance (as interpreted

for the purpose of rule 4.13) than

these attaching to such permanent

post, he will draw as initial pay

the stage of the time-scale next

above his substantive pay in

respect of the old post;"

A reading thereof would clearly indicate that initial substantive pay of a Government employee who is appointed substantively to a post on a time-scale of pay, is regulated, if he holds a lien on a permanent post, other than a tenure post and when appointment to the new post involves the assumption to duties or responsibilities of greater importance, then he will draw as initial pay the stage of the time scale next above his substantive pay in respect of the old post. Thus, it could be seen that when JBT Teachers was appointed temporarily as a Head Teacher, he is entitled to draw, since he is holding responsibilities of greater importance as a Head Teacher, one advance increment n his old post in the time scale next above the substantive pay on the date of his temporarily promotion as a Head Teacher.

The appeal is accordingly allowed. The order of the High Court stands modified. They are entitled to one advance increment in the scale of JBT Teacher at the time of promotion while discharging the duties as Head Teachers. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about State of Punjab v. Lal Singh

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp