CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › State of H.P. v. Naresh Kumar @ Kaka .

State of H.P. v. Naresh Kumar @ Kaka .

Supreme Court of India · 22 April 2009 · [2009] 6 S.C.R. 870

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
22 April 2009
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 1202 of 2003
Reported as
[2009] 6 S.C.R. 870
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1202 OF 2003

State of Himachal Pradesh
.....Appellant

Versus

Naresh Kumar @ Kaka & Ors.
.....Respondents

JUDGMENT

Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT,J.

Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a Division Bench of the Himachal Pradesh High Court directing acquittal of the respondents who faced trial of alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 302 read with Section 34 and 323 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, 'the IPC').

Learned Sessions Judge, Hamirpur had found the present respondent-accused persons guilty and had convicted each one of them and sentenced to imprisonment for life and to pay fine of Rs.2000/- with default stipulation. Learned Sessions Judge, however, acquitted the co-accused Sunil Kumar.

We need not deal with the factual aspects in detail because we find that the High Court has not analysed the evidence in detail. It has come to certain abrupt conclusions about the prosecution version being not credible. Since the High Court was upsetting a judgment of the Trial Court which has been rendered after analysing the evidence, the casual manner in which the appeal was disposed of allowing the appeal filed by the present

Crl.A.No.1202/03 .... (contd.) respondent-accused persons was certainly not the proper course to be adopted.

Therefore, without expressing any opinion on merit, we set aside the impugned judgment and remit the matter to the High Court for fresh consideration.

Since the matter is pending since long, we request the High Court to explore the possibility of disposing of the appeal as early as practicable and preferably by the end of September 2009.

After the acquittal when this Court granted leave, the respondents were not in custody and bailable warrants were issued. They will continue to be so till the disposal of the matter afresh by the High Court.

The appeal is allowed accordingly.

Sd/-
..........................J.
[Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT]

Sd/- ..........................J. [ASOK KUMAR GANGULY] New Delhi. April 22, 2009.

Ask CaseMinister about State of H.P. v. Naresh Kumar @ Kaka .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp