PETITIONER:
SMT. GURNAM KAUR & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
PURAN SINGH & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/02/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
1996 SCC (2) 567 JT 1996 (5) 664
1996 SCALE (2)382
ACT
HEADNOTE
JUDGMENT
ORDER
In this appeal, the only question is whether the appellant is a legitimate child of her father, Ram Singh. Though all the courts concurrently have found that she is the daughter of Ram Singh and her mother Gurnam Kaur, the finding recorded is that she is illegitimate child since the marriage of Gurnam Kaur with her previous husband was not legally dissolved. Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, as amended by Amendment Act 68 of 1976 reads as under:
"Notwithstanding that a marriage is
null and void under Section 11, any
child of such marriage who would
have been legitimate if the
marriage had been valid, shall be
legitimate, whether such child is
born before or. after the
commencement of the marriage Laws
(Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976),
and whether or not a decree of
nullity is granted in respect of
that marriage under this Act and
whether or not the marriage is held
to be valid otherwise than on a
petition under the Act."
Preceding the amendment, declaration of nullity by a decree of a Court is a pre-condition. Amendment 68 of 1976 has done away with it and declared that notwithstanding the marriage is null and void under Section 11, any child of such marriage who would have been legitimate if the marriage had been valid shall be legitimate whether such child is born before or after the commencement of the Amendment 68 of 1976 and whether or not a decree of nullity is granted in respect of that marriage under the Act and whether or not the marriage is held to be void otherwise then on a petition under the Act. Thus it would be clear that declaration of validity of a marriage on a petition of either party or, in other words, declaration of the marriage as nullity under a decree which were preconditions under Section 12 of the Act is done away with. Consequentially, as if the marriage had been valid, the child shall be legitimate whether such child was born before or after the commencement of Act 68 of 1976. By operation of Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 read with Schedule I, appellant being the daughter of Ram Singh, is entitled to the property of her father. The decree is accordingly granted. Application for appointing a guardian of the minor is allowed.
The appeal is accordingly allowed.