CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Shaik Musthapha Saheb v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors

Shaik Musthapha Saheb v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. School Education Department Principal Secretary

Supreme Court of India · 14 September 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
14 September 2017
Case no.
C.A. No. 12857 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, R. Banumathi
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 12857 OF 2017

(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) NO.14860/2017)

SHAIK MUSTHAPHA SAHEB
APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND ORS.
RESPONDENT(S)

WITH

C.A. NO(S).12866/2017 @ SLP(C) NO.15131/2017

C.A. NO(S).12858-12865/2017 @ SLP(C) NOS.14933-14940/2017

C.A. NO(S). 12867/2017 @ SLP(C) NO.24685/2017 @ DIARY NO.19902/2017

C.A. NO(S).12868/2017 @ SLP(C) NO.15577/2017

C.A. NO(S).14983/2017 @ SLP(C) NO. 25238/2017 @ DIARY NO.26666/2017

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Diary No.26666/2017 is taken on Board.

2. Permission to file special leave petition(s) is granted.

3.
Delay condoned.

4.
Leave granted.

5. The issue pertains to the claim made by the appellant(s) for continuance in service up to 60 years of age. The connected matters, viz. Civil Appeal No. 10273 of 2017 & batch, have been disposed of by this Court vide Judgment dated 09.08.2017.

6. Therefore, these appeals are disposed of in terms of the above referred Judgment.

7. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

8. There shall be no order as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [R. BANUMATHI] NEW DELHI; SEPTEMBER 14, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Shaik Musthapha Saheb v. The State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. School Education Department Principal Secretary

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp