CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2016 › Securities & Exchange Board of India v. Dsq Sofware Ltd. & A

Securities & Exchange Board of India v. Dsq Sofware Ltd. & Anr.

Supreme Court of India · 31 August 2016

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
31 August 2016
Case no.
C.A. No. 2467 of 2006
Bench
Anil R. Dave, L. Nageswara Rao
Length
4 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

CORRECTED

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.2467 OF 2006

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

DSQ SOFTWARE LTD. & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1.
Heard the learned counsel.

2. By an order dated 3rd February, 2016, it was directed that Respondent No.2 should deposit Rs.30 Crorers (Rupees Thirty Crores only) in six months with SEBI. It was further ordered that if the afore-stated amount is not paid, the order dated 9th September, 2004 passed by the SEBI, shall stand revived.

3. It is an admitted fact that Rs.30 Crores have not been deposited till today. In the circumstances, orders dated 8th December, 20O5 and 7th March, 2006 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai is set aside and the order dated 9th September, 2004 stands revived.

JUDGMENT

4. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of.

..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]

.................J. [L. NAGESWARA RAO] New Delhi; 31st August, 2016.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.2467 OF 2006

SECURITIES & EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

DSQ SOFTWARE LTD. & ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1.
Heard the learned counsel.

2. By an order dated 3rd February, 2016, it was directed that Respondent No.2 should deposit Rs.30 Crorers (Rupees Thirty Crores only) in six months with SEBI. It was further ordered that if the afore-stated amount is not paid, the order dated 9th September, 2004 passed by the SEBI, shall stand revived.

3. It is an admitted fact that Rs.30 Crores have not been deposited till today. In the circumstances, order dated 8th December, 2015 passed by the Securities Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai is set aside and the order dated 9th September, 2004 stands revived.

JUDGMENT

4. The appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending application, if any, shall stand disposed of.

..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]

.................J. [L. NAGESWARA RAO] New Delhi; 31st August, 2016.

Ask CaseMinister about Securities & Exchange Board of India v. Dsq Sofware Ltd. & Anr.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp