CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › Saiyed Salim Saiyed Hussain Saiyed v. State of Gujarat

Saiyed Salim Saiyed Hussain Saiyed v. State of Gujarat

Supreme Court of India · 4 December 2009

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
4 December 2009
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 2325 of 2009
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, J.M. Panchal
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

CRL.A. No..2325of 2009 @ SLP(CRL.) No. 7359 of 2009

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 2325 OF 2009
[arising out of SLP(CRL.) No. 7359 of 2009]

SAIYED SALIM SAIYED HUSSAIN SAIYED
.....
APPELLANT

VERSUS

STATE OF GUJARAT
.....
RESPONDENT

ORDER

1. Application seeking exemption from filing official translation is allowed.

2.
Leave granted.

3. The appellant stands convicted for offences punishable under Section 8C read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for being in possession of 252 grams of charas. The trial court on a consideration of the evidence convicted and sentenced the appellant to undergo 10 years rigorous imprisonment and Rs. 1 lakh as fine and in default of payment of fine to undergo a

CRL.A. No..2325of 2009 @ SLP(CRL.) No. 7359 of 2009

further period of one year's imprisonment. The High Court has confirmed the conviction and sentence.

4. In this matter, we notice that the appellant has already undergone almost 9 ½ years of the sentence. We also notice that he is being represented by a counsel appointed by the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee and is apparently unable to pay the fine of Rs. 1 lakh.

5. The learned counsel for the State of Gujarat has put in appearance and we have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

6. Keeping in view the facts aforesaid, we direct that the fine imposed on the appellant be reduced to Rs. 1,000/- and in default of payment of fine the appellant shall undergo imprisonment for a further period of one month.

7. The appeal is allowed to the above extent.

..................J
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI]

..................J
[J.M. PANCHAL]

NEW DELHI
DECEMBER 04, 2009.

CRL.A. No..2325of 2009 @ SLP(CRL.) No. 7359 of 2009

Ask CaseMinister about Saiyed Salim Saiyed Hussain Saiyed v. State of Gujarat

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp