CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2011 › Regl.inst.of Printing Technology,kolkata v. Arup Kumar Mookh

Regl.inst.of Printing Technology,kolkata v. Arup Kumar Mookherjee .

Supreme Court of India · 11 July 2011

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
11 July 2011
Case no.
C.A. No. 5341 of 2011
Bench
Dalveer Bhandari, Deepak Verma
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5341 OF 2011

(Arising out of SLP(C) No.1312/2008)

REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF PRINTING TECHNOLOGY,
KOLKATA
Appellant(s)
:VERSUS:

ARUP KUMAR MOOKHERJEE & ORS. Respondent(s)

ORDER

1.
Leave granted.

2. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. The appellant has already paid Rs.10,56,410/- to respondent No.1 towards the pay and allowances for the period 1.4.1974 to 31.12.1994. Learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.1 submits that respondent no.1 has received that amount but he has not been paid any pension from 1.1.2007 onwards. This is not disputed by the counsel for the appellant and they have agreed to pay. Consequently, we direct the appellant to pay balance amount of pension within two weeks. The appellant is further directed to regularly pay monthly pension to the respondent in accordance with law.

4. Respondent No.1 has not been paid any amount which was legitimately due and payable to him for the last 37 years. The respondent was also compelled to contest and defend litigation in various courts for more than 37 years.

5. On consideration of totality of the facts and circumstances of this case, we deem it appropriate to direct the appellant to pay a lump sum amount of Rs.5 lakhs to respondent No.1 towards payment of interest and costs, within two weeks from today. We are giving this short period for payment considering the fact that respondent No.1 is suffering from advanced stage of cancer and require money urgently for his treatment.

6. Learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents states that the formalities which are necessary for getting the pension shall be completed within a week.

7. This appeal is disposed of with the aforementioned observation and direction.

.....................J
(DALVEER BHANDARI)

.....................J
(DEEPAK VERMA)

New Delhi;
July 11, 2011.

Ask CaseMinister about Regl.inst.of Printing Technology,kolkata v. Arup Kumar Mookherjee .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp