CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › Rayat Shikshan Sanstha v. Suneel Shiva Gaikwad

Rayat Shikshan Sanstha v. Suneel Shiva Gaikwad

Supreme Court of India · 20 February 2009

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
20 February 2009
Case no.
C.A. No. 1135 of 2009
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL No.1135 of 2009
(Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No.9835 of 2008)

Rayat Shikshan Sanstha
.....Appellant(s)

Versus

Suneel Shiva Gaikwad
.....Respondent(s)

ORDER

Leave granted.

This appeal by special leave is directed against order dated 20th February, 2008,whereby a learned Single Judge of the High Court at Bombay, has rejected the prayer of the appellant-Management for grant of stay of the order passed by the School Tribunal, directing reinstatement of the respondentteacher.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

Having regard to the fact that the writ petition challenging the direction by the School Tribunal to reinstate the respondent had been admitted for consideration, we are of the opinion that the impugned order cannot be sustained. The writ petition was entertained by the High Court vide order dated 19th June, 2006 and an ad-interim order staying the operation and implementation of the order passed by the Tribunal was passed. However, when the miscellaneous application was taken up for consideration, the learned Judge vacated the said order on the ground that no case for stay was made out.

..2/-

:2:

It is a well settled preposition of law that when an order of injunction is passed, the Court is required to record the reasons. Similarly, when the Court feels that in the facts and circumstances of a particular case, order of injunction is not necessary, it must record the reasons for doing so, taking into consideration all the relevant factors, particularly the nature of the controversy involved.

We are convinced that in the present case if injunction against the direction for reinstatement of the respondent is not granted, the writ petition would be rendered infructuous, resulting in irreparable loss to the appellant herein.

Therefore, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, we set aside the order dated 22nd February, 2008 and direct that the ad-interim injunction granted by the High Court on 19th June, 2006 shall continue to be in force till the disposal of the writ petition.

Since the matter pertains to the career of a teacher, we would request the High Court to expedite the disposal of the writ petition.

The appeal stands disposed of in the above terms but without any order as to costs.

....................J. [ D.K. JAIN ] ....................J. [ R.M. LODHA ] NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 20, 2009.

Ask CaseMinister about Rayat Shikshan Sanstha v. Suneel Shiva Gaikwad

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp