CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1997 › Ramavatar v. State of Bihar

Ramavatar v. State of Bihar

Supreme Court of India · 7 April 1997 · [1997] 3 S.C.R. 683

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
7 April 1997
Case no.
C.A. No. 2951-2952 of 1997
Reported as
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 683
Result
Dismissed
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, D.P. Wadhwa
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
RAMAVATAR
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/04/1997
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY, D.P. WADHWA

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Leave granted.

The appellant claims for promotion as Engineer-in-Chief on the basis of a the basis of a Scheduled Tribe Status. In the judgment in Major Yogendra Narain Yadav vs. State of Bihar & Ors., the right of the person has been determined. In this case, the question arises is: whether the appellant really belongs to Scheduled Tribe? With a view to find the genuineness of the status as Scheduled Tribes, we had directed the petitioner to file geneology table of his family history. It is now admitted in his affidavit that the family of the appellant hails from Bilaspur, Madhya Pradesh. He claims that his forefathers had migrated to Bihar and that the appellant had done his eduction there and had obtained the certificate also from the District Magistrate, Patna, Admittedly, none of his forefathers had been granted any such certificate. The family history, as stated in the affidavit indicates as under:

"GENEOLOGY

Late Chilbili Sah

:

Late Chintaman Sah

:

Late Hira Sah

:

----------------------------------------------

: : : Late Tulsi Sah Late Janki Sah Late Mahabir Sah

------------------------------------

: : :

Ram Avatar Kaushalya Laxmi Narayan

(Son) (Widow) (Son)

: : :

--------------- ---------------- ------------------

Married with Married with late Married to Bagaha

Yashoda Devi Ganga Pd., Patna District Bettiah,

Ara District Old District

Old Shahabad Motihari

District.

: :

: -------------------------------------

: : : :

: Rashmi Bala Ushmi Bala Abhijit

: Daughter Daughter Son

:

: .... All are married ...

: -------------------------------------------------------------------------- - Shashi Nishi Rishi Pawan Suman Sandhya Pragati Raman Bala Bala Bala Kumar Kumar Gond Kumar Daughter Daughter Daughter Gond Son Daughter Daughter Son married married married son unmarried married married unto O.P. to to Unto to Ajay marrie d Gond, Raghunath Birendra married Chapra Kr., Patna Manjhi Sah Jhar- District Patna City Lasia suguda in presently Patna P.S.E. Sabalpur Gopalganj

Kurrudeg District District

in presently

Semdega Jharsuguda

in the (Orissa)

Ranchi

District

now Gumla

District

A reading of this family history indicates that his claim as Scheduled Tribe is not only highly doubtful but beyond comprehension to believe that he eligible for the same. Under the circumstances, we do not find any substance to interfere with the order of the High Court. However, it would be open for the appellant to be entitled to compete as a general candidate.

The appeals are accordingly dismissed but without any order as to costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Ramavatar v. State of Bihar

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp