CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2023 › Rajeswari v. Union of India

Rajeswari v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India · 30 October 2023

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
30 October 2023
Case no.
W.P.(C) No.-000699 - 2021
Bench
Sanjiv Khanna, S.V.N. Bhatti
Author
Sanjiv Khanna
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

2023 INSC 968

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

EXTRA-ORDINARY ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 699/2021

RAJESWARI PETITIONER(S)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

ORDER

We are not inclined to proceed further with the present writ petition, as it is clear from the counter affidavit filed by respondent no. 2 – Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI) that the cellular mobile telephone number once deactivated for nonusage or disconnected on the request of subscriber, is not allocated to the new subscriber for at least a period of 90 days. It is for the earlier subscriber to take adequate steps to ensure that privacy is maintained. The subscriber can prevent misuse of WhatsApp data by deleting the WhatsApp account attached with the previous phone number and erasing the WhatsApp data stored on the local device memory/cloud/drive. Further, as per the information available on the WhatsApp help center, to eliminate enmesh/ confusion in case of re-cycled phone numbers, they monitor account inactivity, and when an account is inactive for 45 days and then the account is activated on a different mobile device, the old account data is removed.

Recording the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.

..................J.

(SANJIV KHANNA)

..................J. (S.V.N. BHATTI) NEW DELHI; OCTOBER 30, 2023.

Ask CaseMinister about Rajeswari v. Union of India

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp