CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Purnima Sailani v. Shailendra Sailani

Purnima Sailani v. Shailendra Sailani

Supreme Court of India · 5 December 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
5 December 2008
Case no.
T.P.(C) No. 888 of 2007
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, V.S. Sirpurkar
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
TRANSFER PETITION (C) 888 of 2007

Purnima Sailani
...
Petitioner

VERSUS

Shailendra Sailani
...Respondent

O R D E R

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. This is an application for transfer filed at the instance of the wife petitioner under Section 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking transfer of Marriage Petition No. 693 of 2007 (Shailendra Sailani Vs. Purnima Sailani) now pending in the Family Court at Allahabad to a Court of competent jurisdiction at Kalyan and Ulhasnagar, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties and after going through the materials on record and considering the fact that a petition under Section 125 of the Cr. PC is already pending before the Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ulhasnagar, Maharashtra and considering the fact that the wife petitioner is having one minor daughter named, Kavya, born on 27th of March, 2002, it would be difficult for her to attend the Court proceedings at Allahabad, we feel it proper to transfer the case from Family Court of Allahabad to Family Court at Ulhasnagar, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra. Accordingly, the case being Marriage Petition No. 693 of 2007 stands transferred from Family Court of Allahabad to Family Court at Ulhasnagar, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra.

3. The learned Judge of Family Court at Allahabad is directed to transmit the case records of the aforesaid case to the Family Court at Ulhasnagar, Distt. Thane, Maharashtra within a period of one month from the date of supply of a copy of this order to him.

4. With the aforesaid directions, the application for transfer is thus allowed. There will be no order as to costs.

…………………………J. [TARUN CHATTERJEE] NEW DELHI ………………… ………J. DECEMBER 05, 2008 [V.S. SIRPURKAR]

Ask CaseMinister about Purnima Sailani v. Shailendra Sailani

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp