CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › Punjab National Bank v. Pnb Canteen Workers Union (calcutta)

Punjab National Bank v. Pnb Canteen Workers Union (calcutta)&ors

Supreme Court of India · 25 September 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
25 September 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 5112 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NONREPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Civil Appeal No. 5112/2017

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK Appellant(s)

VERSUS

PNB CANTEEN WORKERS UNION (CALCUTTA)&ORS Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN J.

1. In this hotly contested appeal, the surviving issue is solely with regard to the claims made by the 29 canteen workers whether they are represented through the union or otherwise, for absorption.

2. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the Bank and having heard the learned Senior counsel appearing for the workmen and having regard the various orders passed by this Court, we are of the considered view that this is a fit case to invoke our jurisdiction under Article 142 of the Constitution of India and give a quietus to the dispute.

3. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of this case, we direct the appellant – Punjab National Bank to appoint 29 canteen workers forthwith on the following conditions:

(i) They shall be paid half wages of the ClassIV employees or prevailing minimum wages in the State, whichever is higher;
(ii) All other benefits which have been granted to the 23 canteen workers already appointed will also be extended to the 29 workers covered by this order.

2

(iii) There shall be no other or further claim on this count from the workmen.
(iv) The benefits, as above, shall be extended to the 29 workmen from the first date of appointment of the 23 workmen.

4. In that view of the matter, we set aside the impugned Judgment of the High Court.

5. We make it clear that no settlement as prevailing in the Bank shall stand in the way of Bank giving effect to the order as indicated above.

6. The appeal is disposed of in the aforestated terms.

......................J
(KURIAN JOSEPH)

.....................J (SANJAY KISHAN KAUL) NEW DELHI; 25TH SEPTEMBER, 2018.

Ask CaseMinister about Punjab National Bank v. Pnb Canteen Workers Union (calcutta)&ors

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp