CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2015 › Prasar Bharati v. Board of Control for Cricket in India and

Prasar Bharati v. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 20 February 2015

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
20 February 2015
Case no.
C.A. No. 10734-10735 of 2017
Bench
Ranjan Gogoi, Prafulla C. Pant
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos. 4572-4573 of 2015

Prasar Bharati … Petitioner(s)

Versus

Board of Control for Cricket in India & Ors. … Respondent(s)

WITH

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) No. 4574-4575 of 2015

ORDER

We have heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. It is our considered view that at this stage we ought not to consider the submissions made on behalf of the parties on the merits of the controversy as the same may have the effect of prejudicing either of the parties.

3. We have considered the suggestions put forward on behalf of the respondents. The first suggestion is with regard to setting up of an extra/special channel which has been contended by Prasar Bharati to

JUDGMENT

be unviable and technically unfeasible within any reasonable period of time. Though an offer has been made on behalf of respondent No. 4 to make available its expertise and personnel to aid the Prasar Bharati, we are not inclined to consider the said offer made on behalf of respondent No. 4. The first suggestion put forward therefore does not merit acceptance.

4. Insofar as the second suggestion i.e. putting up a scroll to the effect that “the channel displaying the sports event (concerned ICC World Cup 2015 matches) is meant only for Doordarshan” has received our consideration. Acceptance of the said suggestion would be understanding the provisions of Section 3 of the Sports Broadcasting Signals (Mandatory Sharing with Prasar Bharati) Act, 2007 and Section 8 of the Cable Television Networks (Regulation) Act, 1995 in a particular manner which is not warranted at this stage of the proceedings. We, therefore, decline to accept the said second suggestion advanced on behalf of the respondents.

5. In the aforesaid circumstances, we are of the view that the interim order passed earlier to the effect that the impugned order dated 04.02.2015 of the High Court shall remain suspended should continue until further orders. We order accordingly. However, in view

JUDGMENT

of the importance of the matter, we direct that the special leave petitions be heard at an early date. List on a Tuesday in the month of July, 2015. The parties may exchange pleadings, if required, in the meantime.

..........………………………J.
[RANJAN GOGOI]

…..........……………………J. [PRAFULLA C. PANT] NEW DELHI, FEBRUARY 20, 2015.

Ask CaseMinister about Prasar Bharati v. Board of Control for Cricket in India and Ors.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp