CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Pradeep Singh v. Gopal Chandra Agarwal .

Pradeep Singh v. Gopal Chandra Agarwal .

Supreme Court of India · 15 February 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
15 February 2008
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 349 of 2008
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

CASE NO.:
Appeal (crl.) 349 of 2008
PETITIONER:
Pradeep Singh
RESPONDENT:
Gopal Chandra Agarwal & Ors
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15/02/2008
BENCH:
K. G. Balakrishnan & C. K. Thakker& R. V. Raveendran

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

ORDER CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 349 OF 2008 (Arising out of SLP (Criminal) No.2458 of 2005)

Leave granted. Heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. By the impugned order dated 10.12.2004, the High Court has quashed the entire criminal proceedings initiated by the Appellant against the respondents 1 to 3 for offences under sections 379, 406, 411, 504 and 506 IPC. For this purpose, the High Court has relied on the documents brought on record by the respondents 1 to 3 and assumed them to be genuine. The High Court has also opined that the dispute between the parties is of a civil nature and the criminal complaint was filed on account of mala fides of the Appellant. 3. The Appellant submitted that the police on investigation found that the accused had committed the offences and had filed a charge-sheet against them. 4. We have perused the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge and find that no reason has been for arriving at a conclusion that the claim of the Appellant was of civil nature and complaint was motivated by mala fides. 5. We, therefore, set aside the judgment passed by the learned Single Judge and request the High Court to reconsider the Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.422 of 2003 and pass fresh order in accordance with law. The appeal is disposed of accordingly.

Ask CaseMinister about Pradeep Singh v. Gopal Chandra Agarwal .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp