CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2011 › Poonam Bansal v. State

Poonam Bansal v. State

Supreme Court of India · 22 February 2011

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
22 February 2011
Bench
Harjit Singh Bedi, Chandramauli Kr. Prasad
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

TP(Crl) No. 333 of 2010

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

TRANSFER PETITION (CRL.) NO. 333 OF 2010

POONAM BANSAL
.....
PETITIONER

VERSUS

STATE & ORS.
.....
RESPONDENTS

ORDER

1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are fully satisfied that this is a fit case for transfer.

3. We direct that Case No. 525/2005 arising out of FIR NO. 145/2005 u/S 498-A/406/34 IPC P.S. City Rohtak pending before the Civil Judge, Senior Division and Additional CJMIC, Rohtak, Haryana entitled Poonam Bansal v. State of Haryana be transferred to a court of competent jurisdiction at Delhi.

4. The Civil Judge at Rohtak is directed to transmit the records pertaining to this case to the

TP(Crl) No. 333 of 2010

Sessions Judge, Delhi. Parties shall appear before the Sessions Judge, Delhi with a copy of this order on the 17th March, 2011 who shall assign the same for disposal to a competent court.

5. The Transfer Petition is disposed of in the above terms.

...... ..................J
[HARJIT SINGH BEDI]

........................J [CHANDRAMAULI KR. PRASAD] NEW DELHI FEBRUARY 22, 2011.

Ask CaseMinister about Poonam Bansal v. State

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp