CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Nidhi Gupta v. Inderjit Singh

Nidhi Gupta v. Inderjit Singh

Supreme Court of India · 8 January 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
8 January 2008
Case no.
T.P.(C) No. 209 of 2007
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

CASE NO.:
Transfer Petition (civil) 209 of 2007
PETITIONER:
NIDHI GUPTA
RESPONDENT:
INDERJIT SINGH
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/01/2008
BENCH:
CJI K.G. BALAKRISHNAN & R.V. RAVEENDRAN & J.M. PANCHAL

JUDGMENT

JUDGMENT

ORDER TRANSFER PETITION(C) NO. 209 OF 2007

Heard learned counsel on either side.

2. Parties have settled the matter pursuant to the mediation held at the Mediat ion Centre, Tis Hazari Court, Delhi. The parties have signed the terms of settlement agreed to in Mediation on 15.11.2007. The Mediation Centre has placed the proceedings thereof before this Court.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had not marri ed the respondent at any time. Learned counsel for the respondent submitted that though he had

earlier contended that they were married, in view of the specific stand of the petitioner, t he respondent also confirms that there is no legal marriage between the parties. The said submissions are recorded as a part of the settlement. It was also confirmed that neither pa rty has a claim against the other and that she/he will not therefore initiate any legal proceedi ngs against the other or the relatives.

..2/-

-2-

4. The learned counsel for the respondent undertakes that he will withdraw the suit (for declaration and injunction) within a period of 15 days. He confirms having already withdrawn the petition under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act.

5. In view of the settlement as aforesaid, we dispose of the transfer petition, as settled out of court.

Ask CaseMinister about Nidhi Gupta v. Inderjit Singh

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp