IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7362-7363 OF 2002
NALLI SANYASI NAIDU .....APPELLANT(S)
VERSUS
MANASA’S TRUST VIJAYANAGARAM & ORS. ....RESPONDENT(S)
O R D E R
After hearing learned counsel for the parties and going through the impugned judgment
,
we are of the view that in exercise of power under Article 136 of the Constitution, no inter
ference
is needed in view of the findings arrived at by the courts below excepting that the directio
n
regarding payment of damages for the illegal occupation of the land from the date of occupat
ion
till the land is vacated by the appellant shall be deleted. We order accordingly. The appeal
s are
disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
In view of the order now passed in these appeals, applications for initiating contemp
t
proceedings are also disposed of.
.............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE )
( HARJIT SINGH BEDI )
NEW DELHI;
MAY 8, 2008.
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Nalli Sanyasi Naidu v. Manasa's Trust Vijayanagaram .
Nalli Sanyasi Naidu v. Manasa's Trust Vijayanagaram .
Supreme Court of India · 8 May 2008
Have a question about this judgment?
Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.
Ask CaseMinister about Nalli Sanyasi Naidu v. Manasa's Trust Vijayanagaram .
Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.