CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2015 › Munni Bai v. Bhanwarlal

Munni Bai v. Bhanwarlal

Supreme Court of India · 15 October 2015

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
15 October 2015
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 1691 of 2009
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1691 OF 2009

SMT. MUNNI BAI ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

BHANWARILAL AND ANR. ... RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

Anil R. Dave, J.

1. Here the appellant is a miserable lady who has not been maintained by her husband. It appears from the record that respondent No.1-husband had been convicted for committing the offence of bigamy but the appeal filed against the said order was pending at the relevant point of time. We are not sure whether in the said appeal respondent No.1 has succeeded.

2. Be that as it may, the fact remains that the appellant is not paid any amount of maintenance though she is staying separately.

3. In the aforesaid circumstances, it cannot be said that the appellant is staying separately without any justifiable reason. In our opinion she should be maintained by respondent-husband.

4. Looking at the facts of the case, we set aside the impugned order passed by the High Court and remand the matter to the trial court so that after considering the

JUDGMENT

evidence, the trial court may take appropriate decision regarding payment of maintenance.

5. The appeal is disposed of as allowed.

6. Parties to the litigation would remain present before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tonk, Rajasthan on 25th November, 2015 at 11.00 a.m. so that the proceedings can be commenced.

.................J.
[ANIL R. DAVE]

....................J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 15th October, 2015.
Ask CaseMinister about Munni Bai v. Bhanwarlal

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp