CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › Municipal Committee v. Regional Commr.,e.s.i.

Municipal Committee v. Regional Commr.,e.s.i.

Supreme Court of India · 2 February 1996 · [1996] 2 S.C.R. 83

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
2 February 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 3508 of 1996
Reported as
[1996] 2 S.C.R. 83
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, ABOHAR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
REGIONAL COMMISSIONER, E.S.I. CORPN. & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/02/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
JT 1996 (3) 51 1996 SCALE (2)381

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

Leave granted.

This appeal by special leave arises from the order of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana dated 5.10.1993 in F.A.O. No.589/93 dismissing the appeal as usual in limine. The admitted facts are that the appellant-Municipal Committee has been running water works known as Patel Water Works. The employees working in the Water Works Department are now sought to be covered under the provisions of the Employees’ State Insurance Act, 1948 (for short ‘the Act’). When notice was issued to the appellant they objected to the coverage of employees under the Act. Therefore an order has been passed under section 45-A of the Act. Challenging thereto, an appeal was filed under Section 75 of the Act. The insurance Court has confirmed that the employees are covered under the Act. Accordingly, when challenged, the High Court in the first appeal dismissed the same. Thus this appeal by special leave.

The question is whether the employees of the Municipal Corporation are also covered under the Act? The employees of the Corporation are governed by the statutory rules made under the Act and in some cases in other States the benefits of the Govt. scales of pay etc. have been extended. However, the fact remains that they are provided with the health scheme and also eligible to medical facilities and reimbursement of the amounts spent by the concerned employees. Under these circumstances, the coverage of employees under the Act is Der se illegal.

The appeal is accordingly allowed. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Municipal Committee v. Regional Commr.,e.s.i.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp