CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2016 › Medical Council of India v. Harshitha .

Medical Council of India v. Harshitha .

Supreme Court of India · 28 September 2016

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
28 September 2016
Case no.
C.A. No. 9252-9308 of 2016
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Uday Umesh Lalit, L. Nageswara Rao
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

I.A. NOS.58-114 OF 2016

IN AND

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9252-9308 OF 2016

Medical Council of India .....Appellant

Versus

Harshitha & Ors. …..Respondents

ORDER

1. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. Upon perusal of the record, it is crystal clear that admission given to the students concerned to MBBS course was conditional. The fact with regard to conditional admission, which was dependent upon the final outcome of

JUDGMENT

the writ petition, was duly informed to the students, as one can see from the admission letter issued to the students.

3. In the aforestated circumstances, the students concerned do not have any right to continue their studies in the same college or to get admission in any other college. Moreover, many of them have not passed the requisite examination of NEET, which is very much necessary to get admission to MBBS course. Needless to say that it would be open to those students, who are qualified to get admission on the basis of their performance in NEET, to get admission elsewhere and they must have participated in the counseling.

4. In the aforestated circumstances, in our opinion, the High Court ought not to have given any direction for accommodating the students in any other college and therefore, the impugned order giving direction to the Government authorities to accommodate the students in other medical colleges is neither fair nor legal and therefore, the impugned order is set aside.

JUDGMENT

5. The interlocutory applications are accordingly disposed of and the appeals are allowed with no order as to costs. ………................................J. (ANIL R. DAVE) ………...............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ………...............................J. (L. NAGESWARA RAO) New Delhi September 28, 2016.

Ask CaseMinister about Medical Council of India v. Harshitha .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp