CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Manoranjana Sinh @ Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Manoranjana Sinh @ Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Supreme Court of India · 15 February 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
15 February 2017
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 240 of 2017
Bench
Arun Mishra, Amitava Roy
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.10 SECTION IIB SUPREME COURT O F INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Crl.M.P. No. 2807 of 2017
Criminal Appeal No(s). 240/2017

MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA Appellant(s) VERSUS CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s) (With appln. For modification of Court's order and office report) Date : 15/02/2017 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN MISHRA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMITAVA ROY For Appellant(s) Mr. A. Sharan, Sr. Adv. Mr. Amit Kumar,Adv.

Mr. Prithvi Pal, Adv. For Respondent(s) Mr. K. Raghava Charyulu, Adv.(Spl. P.P.) Mr. Kailash Pandey, Adv. Mr. K. V. Sreekumar,Adv. UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Crl. Misc. Petition stands disposed of in terms of the signed order.

Registry to take appropriate steps accordingly.

(NEELAM GULATI)
COURT MASTER

(TAPAN KR. CHAKRABORTY) COURT MASTER (Signed Non Reportable order is placed on the file)

JUDGMENT

NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL MISC. PETITION No. 2807 OF 2017
IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 240 OF 2017

MANORANJANA SINH @ GUPTA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Respondent(s)

ORDER

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, we are of the considered opinion that paragraph 19 of the order passed by this Court on 6th February, 2017 be read as under:

“19. In the above view of the matter, the appeal is allowed and the appellant is ordered to be released on bail in FIR RC-04/S/2014-(SIT) Kolkata on furnishing bond of Rs.1 (One) crore and on furnishing two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alipore, Kolkata, West Bengal and also subject to the following conditions.....” We also make it clear that the appellant is not

required to make a cash deposit of the aforesaid amount and execution of bond therefor would suffice. The

JUDGMENT

requirement of local sureties is hereby relaxed as well.

Rest of the order remains intact.

Criminal Misc. Petition for modification stands disposed of accordingly.

…..............J
(ARUN MISHRA)

…................J (AMITAVA ROY ) NEW DELHI February 15, 2017

Ask CaseMinister about Manoranjana Sinh @ Gupta v. Central Bureau of Investigation

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp