CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2013 › Maharashtra St.polution Cont.brd v. Shailesh Narvekar .

Maharashtra St.polution Cont.brd v. Shailesh Narvekar .

Supreme Court of India · 10 May 2013

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
10 May 2013
Case no.
C.A. No. 4652 of 2013
Bench
H.L. Dattu, Jagdish Singh Khehar
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2013 (D.NO.7309/2013)

MAHARASHTRA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL ...APPELLANTS BOARD & ANR.

VERSUS

SHAILESH NAVEKAR & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. OF 2013 (D.NO.12116/2013) SHAILESH NAVEKAR & ORS. ...APPELLANTS

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS. ...RESPONDENTS

ORDER

C.A.NO. OF 2013 (D.NO.7309/2013)

1. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.

2. After hearing learned counsel for the parties to the lis and having perused the records of the case, we are of the opinion that the Civil Appeal, being devoid of any merit, deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly.

3. However, all the contentions raised by the learned counsel qua appellant No. 02 kept open to be agitated in an appropriate proceeding.

Ordered accordingly.

JUDGMENT

C.A.NO. OF 2013 (D.No.12116/2013)

1. Delay in filing the appeal is condoned.

2. We have heard learned counsel for the parties to the lis.

3. After hearing learned counsel for the parties to the lis and having perused the records of the case, we are of the opinion that the Civil Appeal, being devoid of any merit, deserves to be dismissed and is dismissed accordingly.

Ordered accordingly.

..................J.

(H.L. DATTU)

...................J. (JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR) NEW DELHI; MAY 10, 2013

Ask CaseMinister about Maharashtra St.polution Cont.brd v. Shailesh Narvekar .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp