CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2011 › M/S Ram Prakash Sharma v. Baulal Birla(d) by Lrs.

M/S Ram Prakash Sharma v. Baulal Birla(d) by Lrs.

Supreme Court of India · 12 May 2011 · [2011] 6 S.C.R. 757

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
12 May 2011
Case no.
C.A. No. 5310 of 2010
Reported as
[2011] 6 S.C.R. 757
Result
IA disposed
Bench
Markandey Katju, Gyan Sudha Misra
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

I.A. NO.3 OF 2011

IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5310 OF 2010

Ram Prakash Sharma
..Appellant

versus

Babulal irla (D) By Lrs. & Others
..Applicants/
Respondents

ORDER

Taken on Board.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, time to vacate the premises in question is extended till 31st August, 2011 and if the tenants do not vacate on or before the said date, they will be evicted by police force.

We further make it clear that when this Court allows the petition/appeal of the landlord or dismisses the petition/appeal of the tenant and grant some time to vacate the premises in question and if the tenant does not vacate within the time granted, the tenant shall be evicted by police force. This is a general direction we are passing because we are coming across several cases where the tenants are not vacating the premises in question despite granting time by this Court or despite furnishing an undertaking to this Court with a result that the landlord has to initiate contempt proceedings or any other proceedings. Hence, we

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5310 OF 2010

give a general direction that when tenant's petition/appeal is dismissed and he is given time to vacate then on the expiry of that time, he will be evicted by police force if he does not vacate of his own.

If any extension of time to vacate is desired, that application should be filed well in advance.

The Interlocutory Application is allowed accordingly.

....................... ...J.

[MARKANDEY KATJU]

NEW DELHI; ..........................J. MAY 12, 2011 [GYAN SUDHA MISRA]

Ask CaseMinister about M/S Ram Prakash Sharma v. Baulal Birla(d) by Lrs.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp