CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2015 › M/S Master Tours and Travels v. The Chairman, Shri Amarnath

M/S Master Tours and Travels v. The Chairman, Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board and Ors. , Respondent No.2 & 3

Supreme Court of India · 15 December 2015

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
15 December 2015
Case no.
C.A. No. 14620 of 2015
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Arun Mishra
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.14620 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP ( C) NO. 28720 of 2014) M/S MASTER TOURS AND TRAVELS APPELLANT

VERSUS

THE CHAIRMAN, SHRI AMARNATH JI SHRINE BOARD AND ORS. RESPONDENTS

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

The short question is whether in terms of Clause 13 of the Work Order, the dispute raised by the appellant should be referred to the Arbitration. The Clause 13 of the Work Order reads as follows:

“In case of any dispute the matter shall be referred to the Chief Executive Officer – Shri Amarnathji Shrine Board, whose decision in the matter shall be final.” Though learned Counsel for the appellant tried to convince

that the aforesaid Clause has to be read as an Arbitration Clause for settling the disputes between the parties, placing reliance on the decision of this Court in State of Punjab and Others Vs. Dina Nath, (2007) 5 SCC 28, we are unable to appreciate the contention in view of the subsequent decision of a three Judge Bench of this Court in P. Dasaratharama Reddy Complex Vs. Government of Karnataka and Another, (2014) 2 SCC 201.

JUDGMENT

Be that as it may, in view of the long pendency of the dispute, the learned Counsel for the appellant submits that appellant may be permitted to invoke the provision for adjudication before the Chief Executive Officer with the appellant's participation and the same may be disposed of in a time bound manner.

Having heard the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the respondents, we see no reason to deny the request, accordingly, the appeal is disposed of as follows.

The appellant is free to make a comprehensive representation raising all the disputes before the Chief Executive Officer of Respondent No.1, within a period of four weeks from today. The Chief Executive Officer shall look into the same and after hearing the appellant take a final decision in the matter within another six weeks.

No costs.

...................J.
[KURIAN JOSEPH]

....................J
[ARUN MISHRA]

NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 15, 2015

Ask CaseMinister about M/S Master Tours and Travels v. The Chairman, Shri Amarnath Ji Shrine Board and Ors. , Respondent No.2 & 3

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp