CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2015 › M.narayana v. Ramakka (d) by Lrs. .

M.narayana v. Ramakka (d) by Lrs. .

Supreme Court of India · 24 November 2015

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
24 November 2015
Case no.
C.A. No. 13686 of 2015
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 13686 OF 2015 (arising out of S.L.P.(Civil) No.21814 of 2008) M.NARAYANA & ANR. ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

RAMAKKA (D) BY LRS.AND ORS. ... RESPONDENT(S)

With

Civil Appeal No. 13687/2015
(@ S.L.P.(Civil) No.18744/2010)

Civil Appeal No.13688/2015
(@ S.L.P.(Civil) No.28471/2011)

Civil Appeal Nos.13689-13690/2015 (@ S.L.P.(Civil) Nos.4217-4218/2012)

Civil Appeal No.13691/2015
(@ S.L.P.(Civil) No.3805/2008)

Civil Appeal Nos.13692-13693/2015 (@ S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.15557-15558/2015)

JUDGMENT

Anil R. Dave, J.

1.
Delay condoned.

2.
Leave granted.

3. I.A. for substitution is allowed in civil appeal arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.3805/2008.

4. In view of the judgment of this court dated 16th

JUDGMENT

October, 2015 in Prakash & Ors. vs. Phulavati & Ors., the impugned order is set aside and the appeals are remanded to the High Court for a fresh decision on merits in accordance with law.

5. Parties shall appear before the High Court for further proceedings on 14th December, 2015.

6. The appeals are allowed accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.

7. Pending applications stand disposed of.

8. Copy of this order be sent to the respondents in civil appeals arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) Nos.15557-15558/2015.

..............J. [ANIL R. DAVE]

.................J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 24th November, 2015.

Ask CaseMinister about M.narayana v. Ramakka (d) by Lrs. .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp