CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Land Acquisition Collector (south) v. M/S. Harmony Propertie

Land Acquisition Collector (south) v. M/S. Harmony Properties Pvt. Ltd. .

Supreme Court of India · 20 January 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
20 January 2017
Case no.
C.A. No. 777 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, A.M. Khanwilkar
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 777 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2261 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 1487 OF 2017 ] LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR (SOUTH) AND ANR. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

M/S HARMONY PROPERTIES PVT. LTD. & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 778 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2262 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 1550 OF 2017 ]

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 779 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 2263 OF 2017 ] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 1558 OF 2017 ]

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1.
Delay condoned.

2.
Leave granted.

3. The learned counsel for the appellants has brought to our notice that the appeals filed by the Delhi Development Authority have already been dismissed, however, with liberty to initiate fresh acquisition proceedings within a period of one year under The Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013.

JUDGMENT

4. Subject to the liberty, as above, these appeals are also dismissed.

5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. No costs.
.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ A.M.KHANWILKAR ]

New Delhi;
January 20, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Land Acquisition Collector (south) v. M/S. Harmony Properties Pvt. Ltd. .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp