CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › Lalit Kumar v. Uttarakhand St. Electricity Board .

Lalit Kumar v. Uttarakhand St. Electricity Board .

Supreme Court of India · 6 December 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
6 December 2008
Case no.
C.A. No. 7169 of 2008
Bench
K.G. Balakrishnan, Arijit Pasayat, P. Sathasivam
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

ITEM NO.6
LOK ADALAT NO.1
SECTION X

SUPREME COURT LOK ADALAT

CIVIL APPEAL NO.7169/2008 ARISING OUT OF
Petition(s)for Special Leave to Appeal (C)No(s).9633 of 2006

(From the Judgment and Order dated 20.8.2004 passed by the High Court of Uttaranchal at Nainital
in A.O.No.21 of 2004 (F.A.F.O.(Old) No.1030 of 1997

LALIT KUMAR
... Petitioner (s)

Versus

UTTARAKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.
... Respondent (s)
(With appln.(s) for C/delay in filing SLP and amendment of cause title and office report)

Date : 06/12/2008 The above petition was taken up today for settlement

CORAM :

HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE ARIJIT PASAYAT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P. SATHASIVAM

For Petitioner (s)

Mr. Fuzail Khan, Adv.
Ms. Alka Sinha, Adv.
Mr. M.P. Shorawala, Adv.

For Respondent (s)
RR-1
Mr. Pradeep Misra, Adv.
Mr. Daleep Kumar Dhayani, Adv.

RR-2
Mr. S.L. Gupta, Adv.
Mr. Anand Vardhan Sharma, Adv.
Mr. Ram Lal Kadamb S., Adv.
Mr. Goodwill Indeevar, Adv.

This matter was taken up at the Supreme Court Lok Adalat
with the consent and agreement through their counsel.
The following Order/Award is passed :-

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

...2/-

The appellant herein met with an accident while travelling in a scooter. He filed a

claim petition before the Tribunal and the Tribunal was pleased to grant Rs.1,50,000/- as

compensation with 12% interest from the date of the application till payment.

We are told that a sum of Rs.2,20,000/- has already been deposited by the Insurance

Company before the Tribunal towards the compensation.

The appellant preferred an appeal before the High Court for enhancement of

compensation which was dismissed. Hence the appellant has filed this appeal before this

Court.

We have heard learned counsel for both the parties. Learned counsel for the

appellant submits that the left leg of the appellant had been amputated and he had suffered

60% disability. Learned Counsel for the Insurance Company stated that the appellant was

only a Sales Man at the time of the accident.

Having regard to the facts of the case, we are of the opinion that in addition to the

amount already paid to the claimant i.e. Rs.2,20,000/- the Insurance Company is directed to

pay another sum of Rs.2,00,000/- towards the claim. This is the full and final settlement

including the interest in addition to the already paid amount of Rs.2,20,000/-.

The appeal is accordingly, allowed.

(P.SATHASIVAM)
(Dr.ARIJIT PASAYAT) (K.G. BALAKRISHNAN)

Ask CaseMinister about Lalit Kumar v. Uttarakhand St. Electricity Board .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp