CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2022 › L and T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited v. Union of I

L and T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited v. Union of India

Supreme Court of India · 14 July 2022

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
14 July 2022
Case no.
C.A. No. 2397-2398 of 2019
Bench
The Chief Justice, S. Ravindra Bhat, Sudhanshu Dhulia
Author
The Chief Justice
Length
4 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2397-2398 OF 2019

L&T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. Appellants

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents

ORDER

These Civil Appeals arise out of the Order dated 11.02.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) Nos.346 of 2018 and 347 of 2018, which was an interlocutory order.

Mr. Gopal Jain, learned Senior Advocate appearing in support of the appeals prays that final order having been passed on 12.03.2021, liberty be granted to withdraw the instant appeals.

The Civil Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

Interim order, if any, passed by this Court stands vacated.

............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ............................J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

............................J. (SUDHANSHU DHULIA) New Delhi, July 14, 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9652-9653 OF 2019

HINDUSTAN ZINC LIMITED EMPLOYEES CONTRIBUTORY PROVIDENT FUND TRUST Appellant VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. Respondents

ORDER

These Civil Appeals arise out of the Order dated 19.09.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) Nos.346 of 2018 and 347 of 2018, which was an interlocutory order.

Mr. Gopal Jain, learned Senior Advocate appearing for the appellants submits that final order has been passed on 12.03.2021. In the circumstances, he prays for liberty to withdraw the instant appeals.

The Civil Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ............................J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

............................J. (SUDHANSHU DHULIA) New Delhi, July 14, 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.4497-4506 OF 2019

L&T INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED & ORS. Appellants VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents

ORDER

These Civil Appeals arise out of the Orders dated 12.03.2019, 19.03.2019, 29.03.2019, 08.04.2019 and 16.04.2019 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, New Delhi in Company Appeal (AT) Nos.346 of 2018 and 347 of 2018, which was an interlocutory order.

Mr. Gopal Jain, learned Senior Advocate for the appellants prays that final order having been passed on 12.03.2020, liberty be granted to withdraw the instant appeals.

The Civil Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn.

Interim order, if any, passed by this Court stands vacated.

............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT) ............................J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

............................J. (SUDHANSHU DHULIA) New Delhi, July 14, 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

I.A. No.23940 OF 2022

IN
CIVIL APPEAL NOS.3292-3293 OF 2020

HDFC MUTUAL FUND (THROUGH HDFC ASSET MANAGEMENT COMPANY LIMITED) Appellant(s) VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS. Respondents

ORDER

Interlocutory Application No.23940 of 2022 has been preferred on behalf of the appellant seeking liberty to withdraw the instant appeals.

The application is allowed.

The Civil Appeals are, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.

............................J. (UDAY UMESH LALIT)

............................J. (S. RAVINDRA BHAT)

............................J. (SUDHANSHU DHULIA) New Delhi, July 14, 2022

Ask CaseMinister about L and T Infrastructure Finance Company Limited v. Union of India

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp