CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2022 › Kundan Burnwal v. Alok Jain

Kundan Burnwal v. Alok Jain

Supreme Court of India · 28 January 2022

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
28 January 2022
Case no.
CONMT.PET.(C) No.-000939 - 2021
Bench
The Chief Justice, Sanjiv Khanna
Author
The Chief Justice
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

INHERENT JURISDICTION

Contempt Petition (Civil) No 939 of 2021

in

Civil Appeal No 6303 of 2019

Kundan Burnwal & Anr
... Petitioner(s)

Versus

Alok Jain & Ors
... Respondent(s)

ORDER

1 Mr Kapil Sibal and Mr Pinaki Misra, senior counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, stated that though according to the respondents, there was no breach of the judgment of this Court dated 24 August 2020, in order to put an end to the dispute, the respondents shall pay compensation to the petitioners at the rate prescribed in the judgment of this Court and the amounts due (after adjusting any compensation that may have been paid) shall be paid over within a period of two weeks.

2 In view of the above statement, the contempt petition is disposed of.

3 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

…………...…...….......………………........J. [Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud]

…..…..…....…........……………….…........J. [Sanjiv Khanna] New Delhi; January 28, 2022 -S- ITEM NO.40 Court 4 (Video Conferencing) SECTION XVII-A SUPREME COURT O F INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

CONMT.PET.(C) No. 939/2021 in C.A. No. 6303/2019 KUNDAN BURNWAL & ANR. Petitioner(s) VERSUS ALOK JAIN & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 28-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE D.Y. CHANDRACHUD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA For Petitioner(s) Mr. Shankar Divate, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Kapil Sibal, Sr. Adv. Mr. Pinaki Misra, Sr. Adv. Mr. Gyanendra Kumar, Adv. Ms. Shikha Tandon, Adv. Mr. Robin Grover, Adv. Ms. Shree Sinha, Adv. Mr. Zaid Drabu, Adv. Mr. Sumit Attri, AOR for M/S. Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas Aor, AOR UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

1 The contempt petition is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

2 Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(SANJAY KUMAR-I) (SAROJ KUMARI GAUR) AR-CUM-PS COURT MASTER

(Signed order is placed on the file)

Ask CaseMinister about Kundan Burnwal v. Alok Jain

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp