CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2017 › Kalawati Wamanrao Gaikwad (died) Thr Lrs Etc. v. Regional Of

Kalawati Wamanrao Gaikwad (died) Thr Lrs Etc. v. Regional Officer M.I.D.C. Latur and Ors.

Supreme Court of India · 30 January 2017

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
30 January 2017
Case no.
C.A. No. 1223-1224 of 2017
Bench
Kurian Joseph, A.M. Khanwilkar
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1223-1224 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 3451-3452 OF 2017] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 2002-2003 OF 2017] KALAWATI WAMANRAO GAIKWAD (DIED) THR. LRS ETC. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

REGIONAL OFFICER M.I.D.C. LATUR AND ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1225 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 3454 OF 2017] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 2005 OF 2017]

WITH

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1226-1230 OF 2017 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 3456-3460 OF 2017] [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) …...CC NO. 2039-2043 OF 2017]

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1.
Delay condoned.

2.
Leave granted.

3. In view of the order dated 11.09.2015 passed in Civil Appeal Nos. 7070-7071 of 2015, these appeals are also disposed of by directing that 50% of the enhanced compensation granted to the appellants shall be released without security whereas balance of 50% shall be released to them on furnishing security to the satisfaction of the Reference Court.

JUDGMENT

4. The order(s) of the High Court is/are set aside and the appeals are allowed.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ A. M. KHANWILKAR ]

New Delhi;
January 30, 2017.

Ask CaseMinister about Kalawati Wamanrao Gaikwad (died) Thr Lrs Etc. v. Regional Officer M.I.D.C. Latur and Ors.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp