CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2008 › K.sarannappa v. A.chandrakant

K.sarannappa v. A.chandrakant

Supreme Court of India · 10 July 2008

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
10 July 2008
Case no.
C.A. No. 4308 of 2008
Bench
Tarun Chatterjee, Aftab Alam
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.4308 OF 2008
(Arising out of SLP(C)No.12545 of 2008)

K.SARANNAPPA
.....APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

A.CHANDRAKANT
....RESPONDENT(S)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against an order passed by the High Court of Judicature of Andhra Pradesh at Hyderabad in CMAMP No.2194 of 2007 in CMA No.169 of 2007. On perusal of the impugned order, we find that the appeal itself was fixed for final hearing in the second week of June, 2008. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits, on instruction, that in spite of the aforesaid direction made by the High Court, the appeal has neither been listed nor has been decided by the High Court. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case, we are of the view that this appeal can be disposed of only by requesting the High Court to decide the pending appeal on merits and in accordance with law within two months from the date of supply of a copy of this order without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties. We order accordingly. The appeal is accordingly disposed of.

However, if the appeal is not decided within the time stipulated hereinabove, it will be open to the appellant to make an application for further direction.

.............................J.
( TARUN CHATTERJEE )

.............................J.
( AFTAB ALAM )

NEW DELHI;
JULY 10, 2008.

Ask CaseMinister about K.sarannappa v. A.chandrakant

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp