CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2016 › Jashoda Kumari Pradhan v. The Divisional Manager, the United

Jashoda Kumari Pradhan v. The Divisional Manager, the United India Insurance Company Ltd.

Supreme Court of India · 22 January 2016

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
22 January 2016
Case no.
C.A. No. 514 of 2016
Bench
Anil R. Dave, Adarsh Kumar Goel
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NONREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.514 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.2266/2015 @ SLP..CC 910/2016) JASHODA KUMARI PRADHAN & ANR. ... APPELLANT(S)

VS.

THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. & ANR. . ... RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

1.
Leave granted.

2.
Heard the learned counsel.

3. The issue involved in the appeal is with regard to payment of interest, to the legal heirs of the deceased, under the provisions of Workmen Compensation Act, 1923.

4. The Assistant Labour CommissionercumCommissioner for Workmen's Compensation, Odisha, Bhubaneswar, in W.C. Case No.122/2009 dated 18th October, 2014, had awarded a sum of Rs.3,06,180/ (Rupees Three Lakhs Six Thousand One Hundred Eighty only) by way of compensation to the heirs of a deceased workman along with interest thereon @12% per annum. The said Award was challenged before the High Court and the High Court allowed the appeal filed by claimants deleting the provisions with regard to payment of interest.

JUDGMENT

5. We fail to see the reason for which the High Court denied payment of interest to the legal heirs. Therefore, we set aside the impugned judgment passed by the High Court with regard to nonpayment of interest and restore the Award dated 18th October, 2014, directing the respondent to pay interest, as awarded by the Assistant Labour CommissionercumCommissioner. The amount shall be paid by the respondentInsurance Company to the appellants within eight weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

6. If the respondentInsurance Company is aggrieved by this order, it would be open to file an application so that the matter can be reconsidered.

7. Intimation of this order be forwarded to the respondents.

8. With the above directions, the appeal is disposed of as allowed with no order as to costs. Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

..............J.

[ANIL R. DAVE]

..............J. [ADARSH KUMAR GOEL] New Delhi; 22nd January, 2016.

Ask CaseMinister about Jashoda Kumari Pradhan v. The Divisional Manager, the United India Insurance Company Ltd.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp