CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1996 › Insp.general of Registration,u.p.&anr. v. Avdesh Kumar .

Insp.general of Registration,u.p.&anr. v. Avdesh Kumar .

Supreme Court of India · 12 April 1996 · [1996] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 293

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
12 April 1996
Case no.
C.A. No. 7500 of 1996
Reported as
[1996] SUPP. 1 S.C.R. 293
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Bench
Ramaswamy, K.
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
INSPECTOR GENERAL OF REGISTRATION,U.P. & ANR.
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
AVDESH KUMAR & ORS. ETC.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/04/1996
BENCH:
RAMASWAMY, K.
G.B. PATTANAIK (J)
CITATION:
JT 1996 (5) 365 1996 SCALE (4)392

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

WITH CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 7503, 7502, 7504, 7506, 7507, 7508, 7501,

7505/96 [Arising out of SLP (C) Nos.14400 & 12955/93, 2469, 4794, 7355, 7356 & 11946/94 and SLP (C) No.10503/94 (CC-26325)]

ORDER

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

We have heard learned counsel on both sides.

Various orders have been passed by the High Court directing the State either to continue the respondents till the regular selections are made or to give them appointment till the regular selections are made and to pay them the salary attached to those posts. The respondents came to be appointed on daily wage basis in the Registration Department of the Office of the Sub-Registrars in the State of Uttar Pradesh. The controversy raised in these cases is no longer res integra. In Khagesh Kumar & Ors. vs. Inspector General of Regitration [1995 Supp.(4) SCC 182], a Bench of two Judges of this Court had gone into the controversy and given directions in paragraph 24 thus:

"For the reasons aforementioned,

the impugned judgment of the High

Court is upheld with the following

directions:

(1) The petitioners or other

similarly placed persons who were

employed as Registration Clerks on

daily-wage basis prior to 1.10.1986

shall be considered for

regularisation under the provisions

of Rule 4 of the Regularisation

Rules provided they fulfil the

requirements of Rule 4(1)(ii) and

they have completed three years’

continuous service. The said period

of three years’ service shall be

computed by taking into account the

actual period during which the

employee had worked as Registration

Clerk on daily-wage basis. The

period during which such an

employee has performed the duties

of Registration Clerk under

Paragraph 101 of the Manual shall

be counted as part of service for

the purpose of such regularisation.

(2) In the event of appointment on

regular basis on the post of

Registration Clerks, the

petitioners or other similarly

placed persons who had worked as

Registration Clerks on daily wage

basis may be given one opportunity

of being considered for such

appointment and they be given

relaxation in the matter of age

requirement prescribed for such

appointment under the Rules.

(3) The Subordinate Services

Selection Commission while making

selection for regular appointment

to the posts of Registration Clerks

shall give weightage for their

experience to the Registration

Clerks who have worked on daily-

wage basis and shall frame suitable

guidelines for that purpose.

(4) If any of the petitioners or

other similarly placed person was

required to perform the duties of

Registration Clerk as an apprentice

under paragraph 101 of the Manual,

he may submit a representation to

the appropriate authority setting

out the full particulars of such

employment within three months and

the authority concerned, after

verifying the correctness of the

said claim, shall pass the

necessary order for payment of

emoluments on daily-wage basis for

the period he is found to have so

worked on the post of Registration

Clerk. The said payment shall be

made within a period of three

months from the date of submission

of the representation."

In some of these cases also, the respondents came to be appointed subsequent to October 1, 1986 and they are seeking the same directions. All the persons who were appointed either prior to or subsequent to that date would continue on ad hoc basis till regular selections were made in the light of the directions given by this Court and the same directions would operate for payment of daily wages as envisaged in the directions pending regular selections.

It is represented that some of the candidates have become over aged. If any of the candidates, who are now working on daily wages or who had worked on daily wages, would be barred by age by the date of selection, the Selection Committee would suitably relax the age and then consider their cases along with all eligible candidates and in case the candidate came to be selected on merit according to the rules in the light of the directions, he/they would be appointed.

The appeals are accordingly allowed. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Insp.general of Registration,u.p.&anr. v. Avdesh Kumar .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp