CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2016 › Indore Municipal Corpn v. Harish Tolani

Indore Municipal Corpn v. Harish Tolani

Supreme Court of India · 24 February 2016

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
24 February 2016
Case no.
C.A. No. 4088 of 2008
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4088 OF 2008

INDORE MUNICIPAL CORPN & ANR. Appellant(s) VERSUS

HARISH TOLANI Respondent(s)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

1. All that the High Court has done in the impugned Judgment is to remove the observations made by the learned Single Judge that the Commissioner or the Municipal Corporation does not have the power to compound any illegal construction.

2. The Division Bench of the High Court has further clarified that in the joint inspection, if any illegal construction is noticed, the Commissioner should first consider whether the unauthorised construction can be compounded before ordering for demolition of the said construction.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that even going by the direction of the Division Bench of the High Court, the compounding cannot be permitted under law beyond a certain

JUDGMENT

percentage of the alleged unauthorised contruction.

4. These are all matters to be verified on a joint inspection to be conducted by the Commissioner with the present owner of the building and it is for the Commissioner to take appropriate action under law thereafter.

5. Thus, we see no merit in the appeal; it is, accordingly, dismissed, subject to the above observations.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]

New Delhi;
February 24, 2016.

Ask CaseMinister about Indore Municipal Corpn v. Harish Tolani

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp