CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Dr. V.N. Rajsekhar

Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Dr. V.N. Rajsekharan Pillai

Supreme Court of India · 19 February 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
19 February 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 2267 of 2018
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 2267/2018
(ARISING FROM SLP (C) NO.21066/2017)

INDIRA GANDHI NATIONAL OPEN UNIVERSITY APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

DR. V.N. RAJASEKHARAN PILLAI & ORS. RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. The appellant is before this Court, aggrieved by the interim order passed by the High Court of Kerala in W.P.(C) No.18255/2015 which was confirmed by the Division Bench in an appeal vide impugned order dated 11.04.2017 passed in W.A. No.703 of 2017.

3. The issue pertains to the claim made by Respondent No.1 for counting his service under the appellant towards pensionary benefits. Since, the writ petition itself is pending before the High Court, we do not propose to go into the various contentions raised by the learned Additional Solicitor General of India as well as the learned counsel appearing for Respondent No.1. These are all contentions on merits, to be considered by the High Court while disposing of the writ petition.

4. Accordingly, this appeal is disposed of.

5. We request the High Court to dispose of the writ petition expeditiously and being a matter relating to pension, preferably within six months from today.

6. Till the final orders are passed on the writ petition, the interim order passed by this Court on 28.08.2017 will continue to operate.

7. We make it clear that we have not considered the matter on merits and it will be open to the parties to take all available contentions before the High Court.

8. The parties are permitted to file additional documents, if any, before the High Court.

9. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

10. There shall be no orders as to costs.

..........................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] ..........................J. [MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR ] NEW DELHI; FEBRUARY 19, 2018.

Ask CaseMinister about Indira Gandhi National Open University v. Dr. V.N. Rajsekharan Pillai

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp