CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2010 › Hirabhai Jhaverbhai v. State of Gujarat .

Hirabhai Jhaverbhai v. State of Gujarat .

Supreme Court of India · 9 April 2010 · [2010] 4 S.C.R. 498

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
9 April 2010
Case no.
Crl.A. No. 749 of 2010
Reported as
[2010] 4 S.C.R. 498
Result
Appeal(s) allowed
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.749 OF 2010

(Arising out of SLP (Crl) NO.1572 of 2007

Hirabhai Jhaverbhai
.. Appellant(s)

Versus

State of Gujarat & Ors.
.. Respondent(s)
ORDER

Leave granted.

The instant appeal is directed against the judgment

dated September 14, 2006, rendered by the learned Single

Judge of Gujarat High Court in Criminal Appeal No.517 of

1994 by which the conviction of the appellant recorded

under Section 324 I.P.C. and imposition of sentence of S.I.

for six months and fine of Rs.250/- in default simple

imprisonment of 15 days vide judgment dated April 30, 1994

passed by the learned Addl.Sessions Judge, Bhavnagar in

Sessions Case No.131 of 1987 is confirmed. The appeal is

also directed against judgment dated November 9, 2006

rendered by the learned Single Judge of High Court of

Gujarat in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.12531 of

2006 by seeking permission of the Court to compound offence

punishable under Section 324 IPC is rejected.

We have heard learned counsel for the appellant.

From the record it is evident that the incident in

question took place on July 23, 1986. Pursuant to the

order dated January 29, 2010 passed by this Court in the

instant matter, the complainant and injured are impleaded

as respondents and are represented through their learned

..2/-

:2:

counsel. They have filed affidavit stating that the

disputes between the parties have been settled with the

intervention of respectable persons of the society. They

have also expressed their willingness to compound the

offence. This Court finds that after coming into force of

the Code of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act, 2005 from

June 23, 2006 the offence u/s 324 IPC is made non-

compoundable. However, in this case offence u/s 324 IPC

was committed on July 23, 1986 on which date it was

compoundable with the permission of the Court. As the Code

of Criminal Procedure (Amendment) Act 2005 is not

applicable to the facts of the case, offence u/s 324 IPC

would be compoundable with the permission of the Court. In

view of the statement, made by respondent Nos.2 to 4 in

their affidavit and having regard to the facts and

circumstances of the case, permission to compound the

offence deserves to be granted to the original complainant

and the injured.

Hence, the appeal is allowed. The two judgments

impugned in the appeal are set aside. The injured

complainant and two other injured are permitted to

compound the offence punishable under Section 324 IPC. In

view of sub-section (8) of Section 320 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure, the composition of offence u/s 324 IPC

shall have the effect of an acquittal of the appellant with

whom the offence has been compounded.

........................J.
[ J.M. PANCHAL]

........................J.
[ SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR ]

NEW DELHI,
APRIL 09, 2010.

Ask CaseMinister about Hirabhai Jhaverbhai v. State of Gujarat .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp