CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2013 › Gurcharan Singh v. Surjit Singh (d) Thr. Lrs.

Gurcharan Singh v. Surjit Singh (d) Thr. Lrs.

Supreme Court of India · 22 November 2013

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
22 November 2013
Case no.
SLP(C) No. 7735 of 2010
Bench
K.S. Radhakrishnan, A.K. Sikri
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.7735 OF 2010

Gurcharan Singh … Petitioner

Versus Surjit Singh (D) through LRs … Respondents

ORDER

K.S. Radhakrishnan, J.

1. We are of the view that this case raises no substantial questions of law and we are in concurrence with the concurrent decisions rendered by the Courts below. The suit was instituted for performance of an agreement to sell dated 16.3.1993. It was contested by the defendant after filing a written statement. All the parties were given opportunities to lead their evidence. Before the trial Court, during the recording of their evidence, the defendants

JUDGMENT absented themselves and did not appear in the Court on 19.4.1996, though the case was called several times. Under such circumstances, they were proceeded against ex-parte. The suit was decreed on 24.4.1996. The original defendant died on 20.11.1996. The LRs preferred an application for setting aside ex-parte decree. Both the Courts on facts found no reason to set aside the same. In our view, cogent reasons have been stated for holding so. We, therefore, find no reason to entertain the Special Leave Petition since no question of law arises for consideration. The Special Leave Petition is, accordingly, dismissed.

..………………………J.
(K.S. Radhakrishnan)

………………………..J.
(A.K. Sikri)

New Delhi
November 22, 2013

Ask CaseMinister about Gurcharan Singh v. Surjit Singh (d) Thr. Lrs.

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp