CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2016 › Government of NCT of Delhi Through Secretary Land and Buildi

Government of NCT of Delhi Through Secretary Land and Building Department v. Govind Ram

Supreme Court of India · 8 December 2016

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
8 December 2016
Case no.
C.A. No. 12076 of 2016
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Rohinton Fali Nariman
Length
3 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

JUDGMENT

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.12076 OF 2016

[ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO.36628 OF 2016] [ARISING FROM SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C).....CC. NO. 3293 OF 2016 ]

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY, LAND AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT APPELLANT(S) VERSUS

GOVIND RAM & ANR. RESPONDENT(S)

WITH

C.A. NO.12078/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36630/2016 @ CC NO.3303/2016 C.A. NO.12079/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36634/2016 @ CC NO.3305/2016 C.A. NO.12081/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36635/2016 @ CC NO.3309/2016 C.A. NO.12084/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36639/2016 @ CC NO.3455/2016 C.A. NO.12090/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36642/2016 @ CC NO.3546/2016 C.A. NO.12097/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36645/2016 @ CC NO.3612/2016 C.A. NO.12102/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36647/2016 @ CC NO.3628/2016 C.A. NO.12105/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36650/2016 @ CC NO.3631/2016 C.A. NO.12112/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36652/2016 @ CC NO.4195/2016 C.A. NO.12115/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36657/2016 @ CC NO.4271/2016 C.A. NO.12118/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36661/2016 @ CC NO.4315/2016 C.A. NO.12122/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36665/2016 @ CC NO.4326/2016 C.A. NO.12125/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36668/2016 @ CC NO.4331/2016 C.A. NO.12128/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36671/2016 @ CC NO.4422/2016 C.A. NO.12131/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36676/2016 @ CC NO.4468/2016 C.A. NO.12132/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36711/2016 @ CC NO.4497/2016 C.A. NO.12134/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36713/2016 @ CC NO.5254/2016 C.A. NO.12135/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36715/2016 @ CC NO.5256/2016 C.A. NO.12136/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36716/2016 @ CC NO.5301/2016 C.A. NO.12086/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36640/2016 @ CC NO.6118/2016

JUDGMENT

C.A. NO.12091/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36643/2016 @ CC NO.6138/2016 C.A. NO.12095/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36644/2016 @ CC NO.6179/2016 C.A. NO.12100/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36646/2016 @ CC NO.6459/2016 C.A. NO.12104/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36649/2016 @ CC NO.6552/2016 C.A. NO.12108/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36651/2016 @ CC NO.7720/2016 C.A. NO.12109/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36653/2016 @ CC NO.7729/2016 C.A. NO.12113/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36656/2016 @ CC NO.7956/2016 C.A. NO.12117/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36660/2016 @ CC NO.7969/2016 C.A. NO.12120/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36663/2016 @ CC NO.7990/2016 C.A. NO.12123/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36666/2016 @ CC NO.8001/2016 C.A. NO.12127/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36670/2016 @ CC NO.8014/2016 C.A. NO.12130/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36675/2016 @ CC NO.8051/2016 C.A. NO.12133/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36712/2016 @ CC NO.8065/2016 C.A. NO.12129/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36672/2016 @ CC NO.8070/2016 C.A. NO.12126/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36669/2016 @ CC NO.8074/2016 C.A. NO.12124/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36667/2016 @ CC NO.8151/2016 C.A. NO.12121/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36664/2016 @ CC NO.8698/2016 C.A. NO.12119/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36662/2016 @ CC NO.9218/2016 C.A. NO.12116/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.36658/2016 @ CC NO.11431/2016 C.A. NO.12074/2016 @ SLP(C) NO.9643/2016

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

Delay condoned.

2.
Leave granted.

3. It is brought to our notice that the appeals on identical issues, filed by the Delhi Development Authority have already been dismissed by this Court. Therefore, reserving the liberty for fresh acquisition within a period of one year granted in the said appeals, these appeals are also dismissed.

JUDGMENT

4. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.

5.
No costs.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ]

.......................J. [ ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN ]

NEW DELHI;
DECEMBER 08, 2016.

Ask CaseMinister about Government of NCT of Delhi Through Secretary Land and Building Department v. Govind Ram

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp