CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2010 › Geeta Devi v. Puran Ram Raigar

Geeta Devi v. Puran Ram Raigar

Supreme Court of India · 6 September 2010 · [2010] 10 S.C.R. 969

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
6 September 2010
Case no.
C.A. No. 7390 of 2010
Reported as
[2010] 10 S.C.R. 969
Result
Dismissed
Bench
Markandey Katju, T.S. Thakur
Length
1 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

GEETA DEVI & ORS.

v.
PURAN RAM RAIGAR & ANR.
(Civil Appeal No. 7390 of 2010)

SEPTEMBER 6, 2010

[Markandey Katju and T.S. Thakur, JJ.]

2010(10) SCR 969

The following Order of the Court was delivered by

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for the appearing parties.

This Appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated

05th July, 2007 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of

Rajasthan, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur in D.B.Civil Special Appeal No. 10

of 2007.

In our opinion, the Division Bench of the High Court has rightly

held that the appeal against the order of the learned Single Judge dated

07th August, 2006 did not lie in view of Section 100-A, CPC. The

learned Single Judge had decided the Misc. Appeal No. 2777/2003

against the award of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal. In our

opinion, this intra court appeal in the High Court was not maintainable

in view of Section 100-A, CPC notwithstanding anything in the High

Court Rules or the Letters Patent to the contrary. Hence, the appeal

was rightly dismissed by the Division bench of the High Court and this

appeal is, therefore, -2- dismissed. However, dismissal of this appeal

will not prevent the appellants from filing a S.L.P. directly against the

judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 07th August, 2006

dismissing the Misc. Appeal arising out of the impugned award dated

20th September, 2003 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal,

Shahpura, District Jaipur in Claim Petition No. 177/2002, if so advised

and subject to all just exceptions including limitation. No costs.

Ask CaseMinister about Geeta Devi v. Puran Ram Raigar

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp