CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 1997 › Ganpatbhai M Solanki v. Distt Collector Vadodra

Ganpatbhai M Solanki v. Distt Collector Vadodra

Supreme Court of India · 27 March 1997 · [1997] 3 S.C.R. 391

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
27 March 1997
Case no.
SLP(C) No. 6456 of 1997
Reported as
[1997] 3 S.C.R. 391
Result
Dismissed
Bench
K. Ramaswamy, G.B. Pattanaik
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

PETITIONER:
GANPATBHAI N. SOLANKI
Vs.
RESPONDENT:
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VADODARA & ANR.
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 27/03/1997
BENCH:
K. RAMASWAMY, G.B. PATTANAIK

ACT

HEADNOTE

JUDGMENT

ORDER

The controversy involved in this case relates to the terms of the offices of the President and the Vice- President of the Board of the Committee. It is not in dispute that the election to the Baroda District Cooperative Milk Producers’ Union Ltd. was held on June 25, 1982 and thereafter proviso to Section 74 of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act was amended on July 17, 1984 providing for the rules of rotation in the matter of retirement of the members. Subsequently, the election to the Committee was held on May 16, 1994. A meeting was convened by the Collector for election of the President and the Vice- President. Calling that action of the Collector, the petitioner had filed a writ petition which was dismissed. On appeal, viz., L.P.A. No.473/97, by judgment dated February 25, 1997, the Division Bench has confirmed the same.

It is contended for the petitioner for the petitioner that under Section 74-C read with sub-section (2) of Section 145 of the Gujarat Cooperative Societies Act, the term of the Committee is three years and, therefore, the term of the President and the Vice-President is co-terminus with the term of the Committee. As a consequence, the notice issued by the Collector to conduct the meeting for electing the President and the Vice-President is without authority of law. We find no force in the contention.

It is true that under Section 74-C read with Section 145(2), the term of the elected Committee is three years but the bye-law 40.1 provides thus:

"The first meeting of the Board of

Directors after the Annual General

Meeting shall be called within one

month of the Annual General

Meeting. All the members of the

Board present as its meeting shall

elect its President and Vice-

President for the year and the

President and Vice-President shall

hold the office until a new

President or Vice-President as the

case may be is/are elected."

A reading of its clearly indicates that the first meeting of the Board of Directors, after the Annual General Meeting shall be called by the Collector within one month of the Annual General Meeting. Thereon all the members of the Board as would be present at its meeting shall elect its President and Vice-President for the year and the President and Vice-President shall hold the office until a new President or Vice-President as the case may be is/are elected.

Thus it is clear that though the terms of the Committee is three years, the term of the President or Vice-President, as the case may be, elected at meeting of the Board of Directors, shall be only for one year until the new President or Vice-President, as the case may be, is elected again. The collector has been conferred with the power to call the meeting to elect the President/Vice President in accordance with the bye-laws. His action, therefore, is in accordance with law. The special leave petition is accordingly dismissed.

Ask CaseMinister about Ganpatbhai M Solanki v. Distt Collector Vadodra

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp