CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › Executive Engineer v. Sanjay Govindrao Deshmukh

Executive Engineer v. Sanjay Govindrao Deshmukh

Supreme Court of India · 1 May 2009

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
1 May 2009
Case no.
C.A. No. 3870 of 2009
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO.3870 OF 2009
(arising out of SLP(C)No.9795/2009)

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER & ORS.
....APPELLANTS
VERSUS

SANJAY GOVINDRAO DESHMUKH
....RESPONDENT

ORDER

Delay condoned.

Leave granted.

This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18th September, 2006 passed by the learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench at Nagpur, in Writ Petition No.2527 of 2006, by which the order impugned in the writ petition was quashed and set aside and the matter was remanded back to the Industrial Court for final decision making certain observations in the same.

After hearing learned counsel for the parties and after having been informed that the matter has already been heard in detail and is to be disposed of within two months, we dispose of this appeal with the direction that the said matter pending before the Industrial Court after remand shall be decided within one month from the date of communication of a copy of this order to it, without being influenced by the observations made by the High Court as well as by this Court. Interim order stands vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

contd...2/-

::2::

Learned counsel for the parties are directed to supply a copy of this order to the Industrial Court at an early date.

.........................J.
(TARUN CHATTERJEE)

.........................J. (H.L. DATTU) NEW DELHI, MAY 1, 2009.

Ask CaseMinister about Executive Engineer v. Sanjay Govindrao Deshmukh

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp