CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2009 › Dy.commr.of Income Tax v. State Bank of India .

Dy.commr.of Income Tax v. State Bank of India .

Supreme Court of India · 24 April 2009

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
24 April 2009
Case no.
C.A. No. 7269-7271 of 2008
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NOS.9-11 & 12-14 OF 2009

IN
CIVIL APPEAL NO.7269-7271 OF 2008

DY.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Appellant (s)

VERSUS

STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

IA 11-15/2009 in C.A. Nos.7272-7276/2008

IA 9-12/2009 in C.A. NOs.326-329 of 2008

C.A. No.2672/2009

ORDER

This Court disposed of the Civil Appeals by judgment dated 3.12.2008, reported in 2009 (2) SCC 451, by which, in para 47 of the said Judgement, the Special Court was requested to decide the issues mentioned in para 45 of the said Judgment, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three months from that date. Thereafter, on an application for extension of time, this Court by its order dated 26.2.2009 extended the time for a further period of three months and the same is stated to have been expiring on 1.6.2009.

contd....2/-

::2::

Now, by way of present Interlocutory applications, being I.A. No.9- 11 of 2009 in C.A. Nos.7269-7271/2008, IA Nos.11-15 in C.A. Nos.7272-7276/2008 & I.A. Nos.9-12/2009 in C.A. Nos.326-329/2008, prayer has been made for extension of time mentioned in para 47 of the aforesaid judgment dated 3.12.2008 by a further period of three months from the date of the final order passed by the CIT (A) in the Appeals for Assessment Year 1992-93 and Assessment Year 1993- 94 in the cases of the assessee.

After hearing Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, learned Additional Solicitor General and Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the opposite party, the aforesaid Interlocutory Applications seeking extension of time are partly allowed and the concerned Commissioner of Income Tax is directed to dispose of the appeals pending before him within a period of four months from this date, without granting unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

List the rest of the matters in last week of August, 2009.

.........................J.
(TARUN CHATTERJEE)

.........................J. (H.L. DATTU) NEW DELHI, APRIL 24, 2009.

Ask CaseMinister about Dy.commr.of Income Tax v. State Bank of India .

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp