CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. General Manager 1, State Bank of India

Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. General Manager 1, State Bank of India

Supreme Court of India · 20 March 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
20 March 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 3066 of 2018
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Mohan M. Shantanagoudar
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
4 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 3066 OF 2018
[@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NO. 8392 OF 2017]

DINESH KUMAR GUPTA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

GENERAL MANAGER 1, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 1667 OF 2017

IN

SLP(C) NO. 8392 OF 2017

JUDGMENT

KURIAN, J.

SLP (C) No. 8392 of 2017

1.
Leave granted.

2. The appellant approached this Court, aggrieved by the rejection of his prayer for consideration of voluntary retirement under the rules. The High Court took note of the fact that the respondent – Bank was justified in not considering the applicant/appellant for voluntary retirement in contemplation of the disciplinary proceedings.

3. Mr. Rakesh Khanna, learned senior counsel appearing for the Bank, submits that during the pendency of this appeal, disciplinary proceedings have been concluded and a penalty of 'lowering of one grade' has been imposed on the appellant. It is also submitted that since the disciplinary proceedings have been concluded, it is open to the appellant to apply for voluntary retirement afresh, if so advised, in which case, his application can be processed by the Bank.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that there are some arrears of salary, allowances etc. We direct the Bank to clear the arrears of salary and allowances, if any, within a period of one month from today. Needless to say, the appellant shall complete the codal formalities in that regard.

5. We make it clear that in case the appellant chooses to pursue his remedy under the Rules against the punishment imposed on him, this Judgment shall not stand in the way of the appellant to pursue such remedy.

6. In view of the above, the appeal is disposed of.

7. Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of. CONMT.PET.(C) NO. 1667 OF 2017

In view of the Judgment passed above, no orders are required to be passed in this contempt petition.

The contempt petition is, accordingly, closed.

.......................J. [ KURIAN JOSEPH ] .......................J. [ MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR ]

New Delhi;
March 20, 2018.

ITEM NO.2 COURT NO.5 SECTION III-A SUPREME COURT O F INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 8392 of 2017 DINESH KUMAR GUPTA Appellant(s) VERSUS GENERAL MANAGER 1, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ORS. Respondent(s) (FOR EXEMPTION FROM FILING O.T. ON IA 1/2017 and IA No.120157/2017-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS and IA No.14414/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS) WITH CONMT.PET.(C) No. 1667/2017 in SLP(C) No. 8392/2017 (XI) (FOR ADMISSION) Date : 20-03-2018 These matters were called on for hearing today. CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KURIAN JOSEPH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR For Appellant(s) Mr. Surjadipta Seth, Adv. Mr. Ajit Sharma, AOR For Respondent(s) Mr. Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anil Kumar Sangal, AOR Mr. Siddharth Sangal, Adv.

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following ORDER

Leave granted in SLP (C) No. 8392 of 2017.

The appeal is disposed of and the contempt petition is closed in terms of the signed non-reportable Judgment.

Pending Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand disposed of.

(JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (RENU DIWAN) COURT MASTER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

(Signed non-reportable Judgment is placed on the file)

Ask CaseMinister about Dinesh Kumar Gupta v. General Manager 1, State Bank of India

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp