CaseMinister
CaseMinister › Judgments › Supreme Court › 2018 › Dhanraj v. The State of Maharashtra

Dhanraj v. The State of Maharashtra

Supreme Court of India · 30 July 2018

Court
Supreme Court of India
Decided
30 July 2018
Case no.
C.A. No. 7311-7312 of 2018
Bench
Kurian Joseph, Sanjay Kishan Kaul
Author
Kurian Joseph
Length
2 pages
Have a question about this judgment?

Ask our Legal AI about it on WhatsApp: free, no signup, in English or Hindi.

Write it first.

NON-REPORTABLE
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 7311-7312/2018
(ARISING FROM SLP (C) NOS. 6907-6908/2016

DHANRAJ APPELLANT(S)

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA RESPONDENT(S)

JUDGMENT KURIAN, J.

Leave granted.

2. This is a case where reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was dismissed for non payment of requisite court fee. Attempt for restoration was in vain. The High Court was also not inclined to interfere with the order passed by the Reference Court. Thus, the appellant is before this Court.

3. We find that in similar matters Reference Court has entertained the application(s) on condition of waiver of the statutory benefits for the period covered by delay, pursuant to the orders passed by the High Court.

4. The appeals are hence disposed of as follows:- Subject to the appellant paying the
required court fee, within one month from today, the application for reference will stand restored.
However, we make it clear that in the event of Reference Court granting any enhancement, the appellant shall not be entitled to any statutory benefits for the entire period i.e from the date of dismissal (07.02.2001) of the reference to this date (30.07.2018).

5. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.

6. There shall be no orders as to costs.

.......................J. [KURIAN JOSEPH] .......................J. [SANJAY KISHAN KAUL] NEW DELHI; JULY 30, 2018.

Ask CaseMinister about Dhanraj v. The State of Maharashtra

Your 24×7 legal assistant on WhatsApp answers with the judgments that apply, in English or Hindi. No signup needed.

Questions about this judgment, or a case like it?Ask on WhatsApp